Re: [請益] 請問這樣子寫整合寫作會高分嗎? 格式符 …

看板TOEFL_iBT (TOEFL_iBT托福)作者dukechiang (go go go)時間16年前 (2009/12/02 22:26)推噓3(3推 0噓 2→)

留言5則, 3人參與討論串1/1

※ 引述《eastsion (東方翔)》之銘言： : 如題 : 我這樣寫會高分嗎? 格式有沒有需要修改的地方? : 謝謝各位指教 : In the reading part, the writer states that there(is no ) sufficient evidence to prove(that) Macro Polo (used to) visited China and Mongo Area. (In the) contrast, the lecturer in the listening part dosen't consider (that )(evident cited by reading passage)( can serve as strong evident to deny Macro Polo's visit. : The writer illustrates the proof that Macro Polo never visited China and : Mongo because the place-names(in China were never shown) in his own book or the historic : records. But the lecturer (rebuffs this perspective by claiming) that Macro borrowed these place names from Persian, which was ever a prevailing language among the traders.(Therefore, these place-names in Macro' writing were recorded in Persian instead of Italian.( or the language Marco applied in his book) : What comes next is the lack of reference to the contemporarily popular : tea in China(in his book). However, the lecturer disagrees with this view. She comes up with explanation that the tea was mainly popular in southern China rather than the northern China, where Macro stayed. So to speak, absent of description of the tea in his book can not indicate that Marco Polo never come to Great China. Finally, the writer states that there is no pre-modern documents that can support the idea that Marco used to stay and serve in Mongo Palace for 17 years long. As opposed to the writer's claim, the lecturer argues that it is likely that Marco's name is difficult to recognize and this illegibity confused many modern historians. : -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 58.115.163.243