Re: [請益] TPO14 Pastoralism in Ancient Inner E …

看板TOEFL_iBT (TOEFL_iBT托福)作者時間14年前 (2011/09/23 00:36), 編輯推噓2(205)
留言7則, 4人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
引用一下板友的po文 : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Paragraph 4 擷取: Nomadism also subjects pastoralist communities to strict rules of portability. If you are constantly on the move, you cannot afford to accumulate large material surpluses. Such rules limit variations in accumulated material goods between pastoralist households (though they may also encourage a taste for portable goods of high value such as silks or jewelry). So, by and large, nomadism implies a high degree of self-sufficiency and inhibits the appearance of an extensive division of labor. : 9. According to paragraph 4, the fact that pastoralist communities are : subject to “strict rules of portability” encourages such communities to : A) Relocate less frequently than they would otherwise B) Have households that are more or less equal in wealth : C) Become self-sufficient in the manufacture of silk and jewelry : D) Share large material surpluses with neighboring communities (B) Have households that are more or less equal in wealth ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^??? 不好意思 不太清楚選項(B)的意思 可以再請問一下嗎? 感謝 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 111.240.57.71

09/23 02:22, , 1F
應該是 有更多家戶在財富上更加不平等
09/23 02:22, 1F

09/23 02:23, , 2F
Have households that are (more of) less equal in we-
09/23 02:23, 2F

09/23 02:23, , 3F
我猜的!
09/23 02:23, 3F

09/23 03:54, , 4F
美國同學說:this make no sence! 語法有誤?
09/23 03:54, 4F

09/23 11:21, , 5F
應該是more or less才對吧 他們家大約等於所有財富
09/23 11:21, 5F

09/23 16:05, , 6F
抱歉抱歉 more or less 才對 謝謝提醒
09/23 16:05, 6F
※ 編輯: plankton 來自: 140.109.19.9 (09/23 16:05)

09/23 16:06, , 7F
謝謝講解 了解了 :)
09/23 16:06, 7F
文章代碼(AID): #1EUsGCRq (TOEFL_iBT)
文章代碼(AID): #1EUsGCRq (TOEFL_iBT)