Re: [新聞] 屏教大陳姓副教授一口氣被退60篇論文

看板AfterPhD (博士後)作者smartken時間11年前 (2014/07/10 20:03)推噓5(5推 0噓 2→)

留言7則, 6人參與討論串1/4 (看更多)

裡面有60篇文章的名單 SAGE Publications busts "peer review and citation ring," 60 papers retracted http://0rz.tw/0kVeN This one deserves a“wow.” SAGE Publishers is retracting 60 articles from the Journal of Vibration and Control after an investigation revealed a “peer review and citation ring” involving a professor in Taiwan. Here’s the beginning of a statement from SAGE: London, UK (08 July 2014) – SAGE announces the retraction of 60 articles implicated in a peer review and citation ring at the Journal of Vibration and Control (JVC). The full extent of the peer review ring has been uncovered following a 14 month SAGE-led investigation, and centres on the strongly suspected misconduct of Peter Chen, formerly of National Pingtung University of Education, Taiwan (NPUE) and possibly other authors at this institution. In 2013 the then Editor-in-Chief of JVC, Professor Ali H. Nayfeh,and SAGE became aware of a potential peer review ring involving assumed and fabricated identities used to manipulate the online submission system SAGE Track powered by ScholarOne Manuscripts™. Immediate action was taken to prevent JVC from being exploited further, and a complex investigation throughout 2013 and 2014 was undertaken with the full cooperation of Professor Nayfeh and subsequently NPUE. In total 60 articles have been retracted from JVC after evidence led to at least one author or reviewer being implicated in the peer review ring. Now that the investigation is complete, and the authors have been notified of the findings, we are in a position to make this statement. While investigating the JVC papers submitted and reviewed by Peter Chen, it was discovered that the author had created various aliases on SAGE Track, providing different email addresses to set up more than one account. Consequently, SAGE scrutinised further the co-authors of and reviewers selected for Peter Chen’s papers, these names appeared to form part of a peer review ring. The investigation also revealed that on at least one occasion, the author Peter Chen reviewed his own paper under one of the aliases he had created. SAGE and Nayfeh then confronted Chen with the allegations, and weren’t satisfied with the responses, so in September 2013 they alerted NPUE to the case. Chen resigned from NPUE on February 2, 2014, according to the release, and in May Nayfeh retired and resigned as editor in chief of the JVC. This is not the first time we have seen retractions because a researcher managed to do his own peer review. We’ll update this case as we learn more. Update, 2:50 Eastern, 7/8/14: SAGE tells us that there may have been 130 fake email accounts involved. Here’s an email Q&A Cat Ferguson did with a SAGE spokesperson: Aside from Peter Chen, how many other scientists were involved in the ring? We do not know the definitive number of individual scientists involved in this ring and cannot verify their identities due to the nature of the accounts registered with ScholarOne. However, we contacted 130 email accounts, a large number of which we believe to be either aliases or fabricated accounts. Many of the named individuals had more than one email address registered on our system. Throughout the course of the investigation, the authors, co-authors and reviewers were asked to verify their accounts and email addresses provided on ScholarOne. SAGE made a note of suspicious or unresponsive email addresses and accounts. The authors were contacted once again in May 2014 to inform them that their paper/s would be retracted in the July 2014 issue. All authors and reviewers were given time to respond and we did not receive ORCID verification from any of the 130 email addresses contacted. Were any papers retracted that were not authored by Chen? Yes, and the full list of retracted articles can be found in the retraction notice: http://jvc.sagepub.com/content/20/10/1601.abstract Is there any concern this problem might be more widespread? We have undertaken a thorough investigation into this peer review ring and are confident that we have uncovered the full extent of the problem. Although attempts to mislead the academic community are extremely rare, there will occasionally be fraudulent and unethical individuals seeking to abuse the system. Both SAGE and Journal of Vibration and Control are committed to upholding the true spirit of peer review while continuing to introduce new measures to reinforce the review process -- (有興趣參與台大工會運作者，請mail至工會信箱或工會臉書私訊) 台大工會信箱 ntu.labor.union@gmail.com 台大工會Blog http://ntu-laborunion.blogspot.com 台大工會臉書 http://www.facebook.com/ntu.laborunion 台大工會日每周三@二活921教室 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.112.157.175 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/AfterPhD/M.1404993784.A.985.html

Re: [新聞] 屏教大 陳姓副教授一口氣被退60篇論文

Re: [新聞] 屏教大陳姓副教授一口氣被退60篇論文