[連結] Science: http://0rz.tw/b22dI

看板Biotech (生命科學)作者時間19年前 (2006/12/18 02:24), 編輯推噓13(1306)
留言19則, 11人參與, 最新討論串1/1
很遺憾,鬧大了.....T_T -- Lab discipline counts -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.34.51.119

12/18 02:31, , 1F
有人可以轉貼原文嗎 家裡的網路不能連
12/18 02:31, 1F

12/18 02:37, , 2F
3434篇
12/18 02:37, 2F

12/18 02:58, , 3F
It's questionable that the author is a China girl
12/18 02:58, 3F

12/18 03:07, , 4F
就事論事好嗎 別繼續在國籍上做文章了
12/18 03:07, 4F

12/18 03:31, , 5F
Science has tons of writers, why this girl jumps out
12/18 03:31, 5F

12/18 03:32, , 6F
It's reasonable to question what's her purpose
12/18 03:32, 6F

12/18 03:33, , 7F
to write confident article for something unproved
12/18 03:33, 7F

12/18 03:34, , 8F
go to mitbbs to see how nasty they are
12/18 03:34, 8F

12/18 03:39, , 9F
所以 Science 是統媒 所有愛台灣的人以後不該投稿去 Science.
12/18 03:39, 9F

12/18 03:41, , 10F
科學界哪有不准人質疑的道理, 何況她指出的部分確有問題.
12/18 03:41, 10F

12/18 03:42, , 11F
今天就算作者是火星人也不能改變甚麼.
12/18 03:42, 11F

12/18 03:47, , 12F
'd prefer to see this article written from except China
12/18 03:47, 12F

12/18 04:21, , 13F
樓上的...那樣又會有什麼不同?
12/18 04:21, 13F

12/18 06:42, , 14F
和3434篇不同
12/18 06:42, 14F

12/18 09:39, , 15F
不過這篇也早就有了...上面前文也好像出現過...
12/18 09:39, 15F

12/18 09:58, , 16F
推oplz...
12/18 09:58, 16F

12/18 18:15, , 17F
推oplz +1 (前面一大堆人不是馬上就要提出質疑者道歉 ?!
12/18 18:15, 17F

12/18 18:16, , 18F
真是良好優秀的科學訓練/教養 -- fxxxing uncivilized!)
12/18 18:16, 18F

12/18 21:00, , 19F
明明就跟3434一樣 只是3434刪掉一些段落而已...
12/18 21:00, 19F
文章代碼(AID): #15XOjuad (Biotech)
文章代碼(AID): #15XOjuad (Biotech)