Re: [求譯] 翻譯文摘最後三段翻譯不出來

看板Eng-Class (英文板)作者rogerkid (XiaoAi)時間15年前 (2010/05/03 14:46)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)

留言0則, 0人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)

※ 引述《varda0821 (隱藏的秘密)》之銘言：錯別字很多.... 看起來很煩~~ : when people think of men as harassment victims, :fchances are not that images of : either an overbearing, sexually aggressive female boss : or a gay superior coming : on to a subordinate come to mind. such incidents do occur. : but what more common are case where heterosexual menn : create a hostile environment for other : heterosexual men. 當我們想到男性成為受害者時浮現在腦海的可能不是強勢、有性攻擊性的女主管或同性戀上司加害於下屬這樣的事情確實會發生但是更常見的是異性戀男性創造了一個對其他異性戀男性不友善的環境 : supreme court ruled that in cases of men harassing other men,a plaintiff : could win a suit if the alleged harasser was homosexual and therefore : motivated by sexual desire,if the harasser was motivated by a general : hostility toward men, or if men where systematically treated differently from : women in the workplace. 最高法院作出判決在男性侵犯其他男性的案件中原告在下列的情形有可能勝訴 1. 被控訴者是同性戀而且其行為是因性慾而起 2. 被控訴者的行為源於對男性普遍的敵意 3. 或者在職場上男性結構性的受到和女性不同的待遇 : in an odd twist,by the logic of this final criterion, : an alleged harasser could be innocent if he could show : that he had equal contempt for men and women. : indeed,this defense was used successfully in 2000 in a case involving : a male supervisor who had punished a female employee for sleeping with him : and threw away a male employee's belongings : when he didn't succumb to the boss's advances. : the court ruled that "conduct occurring equally to members of both : genders cannot be discrimination because of sex". : the fact remains,however, : that cases of harassment constitute mate assertions of power over women. 在比較難認定的情況下被控訴者要是能證明他對男性女性係平等的予以敵視依照前述最後一個要件的邏輯他是有可能無罪的這樣的辯詞也確實在一個2000年的案子中運用成功該案...(略)... 本院判決「如果該行為係公平的投予男性與女性成員則不能認定係基於性別的歧視」不過這樣的行為仍有可能符合「對女性施壓(暴)」的指控這篇文章第一段所說的hostile environment指的應該是非基於性慾望的侵害可能該上司打出生就很討厭同性打壓同性員工等或是那個上司雖然不是同性戀但是喜歡對同性員工起手動腳毛手毛腳的讓該員工覺得很七八毛要讀懂這篇文章可能要先理解美國對sexual harassment的認知美國的harassment其實是基於平等權而來的究竟是不是肇因於性反而不是重點~~ 在這樣的邏輯下..... 如果該主管每天各挑一個男性職員和一個女性職員打屁屁的話就不構成~~harassment 當然性方面的harassment仍是核心 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.158.240 ※ 編輯: rogerkid 來自: 140.112.158.240 (05/03 14:52)

Re: [求譯] 翻譯文摘 最後三段翻譯不出來

Re: [求譯] 翻譯文摘最後三段翻譯不出來