Re: [語文] GWD6-CR-14

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者flac (老獅子)時間16年前 (2008/07/29 17:43)推噓1(1推 0噓 0→)

留言1則, 1人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)

我試著解釋看看廣告中主要的論點是:市長雖然把一些工作給拿掉了但是他也新增了些工作並且這些新工作的平均薪資高於所有工作的平均表面看來好像是個德政問題在於萬一他刪掉的那些工作平均薪水若高於他新增工作的平均薪水會導致全部工作的平均薪水下降這樣還不如不要刪掉原來的工作唯一能解套的就是他刪掉的那些工作不是些高薪的工作這樣的話就不會壓低全部工作的平均薪水所以D的說明很合理:刪掉的工作平均薪水跟原來所有工作的平均薪水相當這樣他們被刪掉沒影響到整體平均而又加上些高薪工作(題目說的) 這樣全市的平均薪水會因此而拉高些--->德政成立 ※ 引述《minimumi (米尼)》之銘言： : ★ Q14: : Political Advertisement: : Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in : the city under Delmont's leadership. Yet the fact is that not only : were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for : these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide : every year since Delmont took office. So there can be no question that : throughout Delmont's tenure the average paycheck in this city has been : getting steadily bigger. : Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in : the advertisement? : A. The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years : was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier : in Mayor Delmont’s tenure. : B. Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took : office. : C. Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont's tenure have : in the meantime been eliminated again. : D. The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont's : tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs : citywide. : E. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for : jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city. : 這題答案是(D) : CR總結上有詳細的解答~但是沒看懂 : "僅僅對比了新增工作機會和就任以來全市平均收入，如果不對比新增工作機會 : 和減少工作機會的平均收入哪個高（A），仍然有可能總收入是下降的。新增 : 的工作收入高，所以只要去掉的工作收入一樣，總平均收入還是高的。所以D對。" : 有沒有比較簡單易懂的方法可以解釋選項(D)對的原因 : (不太能懂那些收入之間的關係~腦筋轉不過來..) : 謝謝! -- No doubt, just keep walking -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.168.86.30