Re: [語文] PP1-CR-55

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者iammarsman (GMAT)時間17年前 (2008/10/01 16:34)推噓1(1推 0噓 1→)

留言2則, 1人參與討論串2/3 (看更多)

※ 引述《prettyting (get a food in the door)》之銘言： : According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements : to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically. : The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five : years by raising automobile tolls on the two highway bridges along the route : the rail line serves. Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, : authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because : it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from : which they receive no benefit. : Which of the following, if true, would cast the most doubt on the : effectiveness of the authority's plan to finance the proposed improvements by : increasing bridge tolls? 反駁authority所說的 -> 即支持作者觀點 -> 本題考支持反駁對象：增加兩橋收費可提升鐵路載客量即支持：增加兩橋收費無法提升鐵路載客量 : (A) Before the authority increases tolls on any of the area bridges, it is : required by law to hold public hearings at which objections to the proposed : increase can be raised. 舉辦公聽會跟提升鐵路載客量無關 : (B) Whenever bridge tolls are increased, the authority must pay a private : contractor to adjust the automated toll-collecting machines. 本題只考慮鐵路載客量，不考慮錢的問題 : (C) Between the time a proposed toll increase is announced and the time : the increase is actually put into effect, many commuters buy more tokens : than usual to postpone the effects of the increase. 用路人囤積過路票，跟提升鐵路載客量無關 : (D) When tolls were last increased on the two bridges in question, almost 20 : percent of the regular commuter traffic switched to a slightly longer : alternative route that has since been improved. 20%的人不走增收的兩橋改走其他路，所以仍然不會來坐火車，故增加兩橋收費仍無法提升鐵路載客量，完成反駁 : (E) The chairman of the authority is a member of the Tristate Automobile Club : that has registered strong opposition to the proposed toll increase. chairman是何許人也但乘客不鳥他也沒用，這是一個無關答案 : 答案是D : 我當初選對是因為其他都被刪光了剩下D，可是看完了CD的討論後還是不明瞭為什麼D會 : 反駁上文，麻煩各位大大解惑~謝謝! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 203.73.111.136 ※ 編輯: iammarsman 來自: 203.73.111.136 (10/01 16:34)