Re: [問題] 請問有關CR的assumption題

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者santa ( )時間17年前 (2008/12/12 13:53)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)

留言0則, 0人參與討論串6/6 (看更多)

※ 引述《alima (賈考柏)》之銘言： : Press Secretary: : Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations : demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts : controlled by opposition parties. : They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects : canceled were in such districts. : But all of the canceled projects had been identified : as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors. : So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, : not partisan politics. : Which of the following is an assumption : on which the press secretary’s argument depends? 提供一下我的想法, 有錯請指正:) 題目的邏輯論述是: 因為被取消的project 所以總統做的決定是基於都經由中立方確認為浪費 ---> 預算而不是政黨偏見 : 1. Canceling highway projects was not the only way : for the President to punish legislative districts : controlled by opposition parties. 取消project不是唯一用來....的方法, 看到only就不太想選了, 明顯錯, 無關選項. : 2. The scheduled highway projects identified : as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects : in districts controlled by the President’s party. 被確認為浪費的project, 大部分不在總統黨管轄區, 大方向一致, 先保留. : 3. The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion : of all the highway projects : that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future. in the near future錯, 時間焦點不對. : 4. The highway projects canceled in districts : controlled by the President’s party : were not generally more expensive : than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties. 總統黨管轄區被取消的project沒有比較貴, 錯誤比較+無關資訊(cost) : 5. Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded : by the opposition parties as a source of objective : assessments of government projects 中立方的報告一般不被反對黨當做客觀的評估. 這感覺weaken了原題的論述. 如果不看中立方的資訊, 如何推出總統決策是基於預算考量而非政黨偏見呢? 大方向錯. 結論只好回去選B了有錯請指教^^ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.168.40.194