Re: [問題] 請問有關CR的assumption題

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者alima (賈考柏)時間17年前 (2008/12/12 13:02)推噓1(1推 0噓 12→)

留言13則, 2人參與討論串5/6 (看更多)

※ 引述《over1221 (照著感覺走)》之銘言： : 之前有大牛提供了一個方法 : 方法一 : 結論有新觀念找有not的選項 : 結論沒有新觀念去找新觀念 : 最近在寫assumption的題目我發現這個方法多少有幫助 : 手足無措的時候可以用 : 方法二 : 在選項前加not 看可不可以反駁結論 : 方法三 : 最後是老方說得 assumption像是一個橋他要連接前提和結論 : 如果兩方有一方不是橋的兩邊必錯我用這個方式可以刪去一些無關選項, 很快比方說有提到文中沒有出現過的新元素....這選項就優先刪除但有時候題目後面會加一些奇怪的意見......比方 Press Secretary: Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts. But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors. So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics. Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends? 題目是問說抱怨總統取消高速公路的提案是為了懲罰反對黨證據是 90%被取消的提案都落在這個區間裡但我看不懂的是後來的But, 他說這些廢案都被無黨籍的人認為是浪費所以總統的選擇出發點並非黨派影響？ 1. Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. 2. The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party. 3. The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future. 4. The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties. 5. Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects 如題, 請問此題怎麼切入會比較好 ? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 123.240.83.123