Re: [問題] pp cr 62

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者apada (我不要有包袱)時間17年前 (2009/01/01 23:28)推噓0(0推 0噓 1→)

留言1則, 1人參與討論串3/4 (看更多)

甲乙丙丁是寫題順序 ※ 引述《shyuan (好奇怪喔)》之銘言： : Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to reject a job : applicant if working in the job would entail a 90 percent chance that the : applicant would suffer a heart attack. The presiding judge justified the : ruling, saying that it protected both employees and employers. 乙.判定 the presiding...最後為結論句但發現結論句很奇怪突然跑出來丙.修正想法開除心臟病-->可以保護員工和雇主丁.焦點在於是不是開除心臟病就可以保護員工和雇主 : The use of this court ruling as part of the law could not be effective in : regulating employment practices if which of the following were true? 甲.下面選項哪個是發生的話上面所述就無法有效-->weaken 有結論句 : (A) The best interests of employers often conflict with the interests of : employees. 兩個人興趣的差別........與議題無關 : (B) No legally accepted methods exist for calculating the risk of a job : applicant's having a heart attack as a result of being employed in any : particular occupation. 根本沒有合法的方式判定心臟病否定因! weaken~ : (C) Some jobs might involve health risks other than the risk of heart attack. 其他的健康風險....與議題無關 : (D) Employees who have a 90 percent chance of suffering a heart attack may be : unaware that their risk is so great. 他們有沒有察覺...與議題無關 : (E) The number of people applying for jobs at a company might decline if the : company, by screening applicants for risk of heart attack, seemed to : suggest that the job entailed high risk of heart attack. 公司跟他們說會得心臟病....與議題無關一開始判定還是會有所錯誤但就不要怕先往下寫繞在題幹裡面有時候會越繞越不知道自己在做什麼這題訊號字沒有很強烈或許有其他大大可以分享但訊號字自己總結可能會比較有效唷... ans B : 看不太懂這題的意思 : 想順便請教看不懂題目時這題選項要如何排除呢 : 謝謝大家~~~~ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.137.35.244 ※ 編輯: apada 來自: 114.137.35.244 (01/01 23:29)