[問題] OG 100

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者 (夢想~~)時間16年前 (2009/08/22 17:33), 編輯推噓1(101)
留言2則, 1人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other copanies. This technique commanly called "benchmarking," permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices. Any of the following, if true, is a vaild reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT: (A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs. (B) Getting "inside" information about the unique practices of competitiors is particularly difficult. (C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors. (D) Managers are generally more respective to new ideas that they fiund outside their own industry. (E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products or markets. Ans:E 請大大可以幫忙解釋一下 為什麼答案昰E,A不可以? 謝謝!! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 123.192.49.169

08/24 21:59, , 1F
A 的already employs 表示採用competitors的話 是重
08/24 21:59, 1F

08/24 22:00, , 2F
復的 所以說competitors法沒用
08/24 22:00, 2F
文章代碼(AID): #1AZxjNBG (GMAT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文
1
2
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):
1
2
1
2
文章代碼(AID): #1AZxjNBG (GMAT)