Re: [問題] OG 100

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者marcus957時間16年前 (2009/08/25 14:54)推噓1(1推 0噓 1→)

留言2則, 2人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)

※ 引述《justinkay (夢想～～)》之銘言： : One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other : copanies. This technique commanly called "benchmarking," permits the manager : of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a : justification for the adoption of good practices. : Any of the following, if true, is a vaild reason for benchmarking the : performance of a company against companies with which it is not in : competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT: : (A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that : the manager making the comparisons already employs. : (B) Getting "inside" information about the unique practices of competitiors : is particularly difficult. : (C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have : comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is : likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors. : (D) Managers are generally more respective to new ideas that they fiund : outside their own industry. : (E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of : practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products : or markets. : Ans:E : 請大大可以幫忙解釋一下為什麼答案昰E,A不可以? : 謝謝!! 一個經理人要怎麼合理化他是從與非競爭者的比較中學到對方的better practice 而非與競爭者的比較 A 與競爭者比較大多只會focus在這個經理早就用過的招數--因為彼此是競爭者英雄所見略同吧 B 要學到競爭者絕招的密奧特別不容易 C 競爭者彼此應該都有差不多的效率--此處是假設完全競爭吧--只有與非競爭者學習才能贏競爭者 D 經理人大多對產業外的點子比較重視(respectful?) E 大多好公司的成功都導因於他們能成功利用他們產品與市場的特殊環境--如此一來那跟競爭者與非競爭者比不都一樣以上淺見 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.66.245.2