[語文] GWD 10-29

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者joanna7766 (~~Joanna~~)時間16年前 (2009/09/30 15:38)推噓1(1推 0噓 0→)

留言1則, 1人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)

我還是不懂這一題請問有人可以幫我解釋一下嗎?? GWD-10-Q29：GWD-2-14 Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted. This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job. On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base. The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort. 結論: 成功率高並不表示這些募集基金的人認真遊說 Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument? A. Smithtown University's fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people. S 學校基金募集人向有潛力的捐款者聯繫的次數跟其他學校基金募集人的次數一樣; 竟然都跟別人一樣表示他們募集基金成功率高不是來自於他們認真遊說 C. This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university's fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors. 今年募到的錢不是因為基金募集人跟捐款者連繫而募到的, 所以成功率高不是因為他們認真遊說我怎麼覺得A跟C都對.......... 答案是A C錯在哪裡呢?? 麻煩高手回答一下謝謝:)~ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.119.232.32