Re: [CR. ] GWD 23-Q32

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者francy (小法)時間15年前 (2011/04/12 17:28)推噓1(1推 0噓 0→)

留言1則, 1人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)

原文是在說"羅帝國的一個城市(Sepphoris)挖掘出了不同的馬賽克鑲嵌圖案其中刻畫了許多已存在的地中海域魚類圖騰, 但是奇怪的是這些魚類在當時的Sepphoris並不存在, 但是因為這些一樣的圖騰也存在於羅馬帝國的其他城市, 所以推論這些馬賽克圖騰是由羅馬帝國其他城市的流浪藝術家所雕刻的邏輯圖應該是因為其他城市也有一樣的圖騰+這些物種在當時的Sepphoris不存在 --> 尤其他城市的流浪藝術家所造選項A: 講述馬賽克圖騰的製成原料 --> 不相關選項B: 講述物種的原始居住地 --> 不相關選項C: 講述所有Sepphoris的圖騰都在其他地方出現過 --> 補充主題選項D: 講述所有馬賽克圖騰中所刻的魚類都已被辨識出來 --> 重複premise中的論述, 所以不相關選項E: (正解) 講述沒有一種共同馬賽克設計風格是不同城市的藝術家都熟悉的若推翻的話 --> 就削弱了由其他城市的藝術家所造的可能 (有可能只是因為大家都會這種風格的創作) 若成立的話 --> 就加強了由別的城市的藝術家所造的可能 (因為本地藝術家沒辦法設計出這些他們沒見過的生物) 因此選項E的存在是crucial的 ※ 引述《cindy2015 ()》之銘言： : 眼看考試快到了 : 我的CR好像出了大問題.... : Q. Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered numerous detailed : mosaics depicting several readily identifiable animal species: a hare, a : partridge, and various Mediterranean fish. Oddly, most of the species : represented did not live in the Sepphoris region when these mosaics were : created. Since identical motifs appear in mosaics found in other Roman : cities, however, the mosaics of Sepphoris were very likely created by : traveling artisans from some other part of the Roman Empire. : Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? : A.The Sepphoris mosaics are not composed exclusively of types of stones found : naturally in the Sepphoris area. : B. There is no single region to which all the species depicted in the Sepphoris : mosaics are native. : C. No motifs appear in the Sepphoris mosaics that do not also appear in the : mosaics of some other Roman city. : D. All of the animal figures in the Sepphoris mosaics are readily identifiable : as representations of known species. : E. There was not a common repertory of mosaic designs with which artisans who : lived in various parts of the Roman Empire were familiar. : 這題答案是E : 請問是怎麼推出這個假設的? : 想了好久都想不透@@ : 還請版友指教 : 謝謝 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 203.66.141.253