OG12-CR 48

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者 (天天保持好心情)時間15年前 (2011/04/16 11:25), 編輯推噓0(006)
留言6則, 2人參與, 最新討論串1/4 (看更多)
If the county continues to collect residential trash at current levels, landfills will soon be overflowing and parkland will need to be used in order to create more space. Charging each household a fee for each pound of trash it puts out for collection will induce residents to reduce the amount of trash they create; this charge will therefore protect the remaining county parkland. Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above? (A) Residents will reduce the amount of trash they put out for collection by reducing the number of products they buy. (B) The collection fee will not significantly affect the purchasing power of most residents, even if their households do not reduce the amount of trash they put out. (C) The collection fee will not induce residents to dump their trash in the parklands illegally. (D) The beauty of county parkland is an important issue for most of the county's residents. (E) Landfills outside the county's borders could be used as dumping sites for the county's trash. 我想請問這一題 我的想法是 charge----protect the remaining parkland. (B) 後面說 雖然不會減少垃圾量 所以沒有反駁 (C)取非反駁 (D)The beauty is an important issue 跳脫討論範圍 (D)Landfills 主角不對 請問A是錯在哪裡 A是說居民將會減少他們所製造的垃圾量藉由他們所購買的東西 在講白話一點 trash減少 protect the remaining parkland. 這樣好像對耶 請問我哪裡想錯了 謝 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 219.85.113.254

04/16 23:02, , 1F
A的答案focurs on減少垃圾量結論,沒有直接跟"fee"關
04/16 23:02, 1F

04/16 23:02, , 2F
連到。
04/16 23:02, 2F

04/16 23:14, , 3F
且主題圍繞parkland。
04/16 23:14, 3F

04/16 23:49, , 4F
可是垃圾量減少不是也會保護剩下的 parkland????
04/16 23:49, 4F

04/17 10:56, , 5F
那你就落入陷阱拉,不能自己主觀推斷答案
04/17 10:56, 5F

04/17 12:28, , 6F
TKS
04/17 12:28, 6F
文章代碼(AID): #1DgGmxTe (GMAT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
15年前, 04/25
0
1
1
1
15年前, 04/17
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):
15年前, 04/25
0
1
1
1
15年前, 04/17
0
6
15年前, 04/16
文章代碼(AID): #1DgGmxTe (GMAT)