Re: OG12-CR 48
※ 引述《chenemily (天天保持好心情)》之銘言:
: If the county continues to collect residential trash at current levels,
: landfills will soon be overflowing and parkland will need to be used in order
: to create more space. Charging each household a fee for each pound of trash
: it puts out for collection will induce residents to reduce the amount of
: trash they create; this charge will therefore protect the remaining county
: parkland.
: Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
先分析題目是「如何drawing」這個結論的:
fee → reduce the amount → protect parkland
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
logical line conclusion
也就是說,答案必須要找出fee與reduce the amount之間的關係。
: (A) Residents will reduce the amount of trash they put out for collection by
: reducing the number of products
: they buy.
藉由什麼「方法」reduce垃圾,跟logical line沒有關係。轉移焦點。
這個不是support題,
所以必須要從「題目給定」的東西去找關聯。
而且,
照原PO取非來找正解的模式,
A選項取非後--
居民不會藉由少買東西來減少垃圾。
這也沒有weaken到結論,
因為居民還是可以藉由其他方法來減少垃圾。
: (B) The collection fee will not significantly affect the purchasing power of
: most residents, even if their households do not reduce the amount of trash
: they put out.
: (C) The collection fee will not induce residents to dump their trash in the
: parklands illegally.
清楚表達出,fee與reduce the amount之間的關係.
這個取非後--
fee會讓居民非法倒垃圾到公園地。
馬上weaken結論。
: (D) The beauty of county parkland is an important issue for most of the
: county's residents.
: (E) Landfills outside the county's borders could be used as dumping sites for
: the county's trash.
: 我想請問這一題 我的想法是
: charge----protect the remaining parkland.
: (B) 後面說 雖然不會減少垃圾量 所以沒有反駁
: (C)取非反駁
: (D)The beauty is an important issue 跳脫討論範圍
: (D)Landfills 主角不對
: 請問A是錯在哪裡 A是說居民將會減少他們所製造的垃圾量藉由他們所購買的東西
: 在講白話一點 trash減少 protect the remaining parkland.
: 這樣好像對
: 請問我哪裡想錯了
: 謝
--
"人類最討厭事物並非謊言,而是沒經過修飾的實話"
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 122.116.100.19
→
04/17 12:27, , 1F
04/17 12:27, 1F
討論串 (同標題文章)
GMAT 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章