Re: [問題] GWD-6-31

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者danyuchn (Javy)時間13年前 (2012/07/25 20:50)推噓2(2推 0噓 3→)

留言5則, 2人參與討論串2/3 (看更多)

※ 引述《la01964344 (辛巴)》之銘言： : Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create : farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively : inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly : deforested whole regions. : A. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States : create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively : inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also : B. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States : create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers : relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also : C. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland : (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive : houses and furniture, but also : D. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland : (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive : houses and furniture, but it also : E. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created : farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively : inexpensive houses and furniture, but it : 想請問各位前輩為什麼答案是B 而不是D呢? 你的答案來源可能錯了，這一題是從prep中擷取而來，官方答案是D。 Ron有回答過關於這題的討論串： http://tinyurl.com/cbw9ga7 : 我知道B的文法是對的但是他的句意用not only...but also是不是有點怪 : 因為一個是好事一個是壞事是的，表達同方向列舉用not only...but (also) 表達轉折的'然而'用but就好並且create 跟 caused的時態也違反平行原則。 : D的問題是最後那個it 可能指代到整件事但前面的單數名詞也是clearing而已 : 還是說因為A的clearing of forest不能做gave consumers...這個動作所以句意錯誤呢? 在平行連接的兩個句子裡，it若為其中一句的主詞則優先指代另一平行句中的主詞。這是指代的特殊原則。 Dustin -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 1.162.24.117