[問題] CR-GWD-7-41
Magazine Publisher: Our magazine does not have a liberal bias. It is true
that when a book review we had commissioned last year turned out to express
distinctly conservative views, we did not publish it until we had also
obtained a second review that took a strongly liberal position. Clearly,
however, our actions demonstrate not a bias in favor of liberal views but
rather a commitment to a balanced presentation of diverse opinions.
Determining which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the
cogency of the magazine publisher’s response?
想請問這題 不知道我想的對不對 有錯請指正 > <
因果:our actions demonstrate-->a commitment to a balanced presentation of
diverse opinions.
A. Whether any other magazines in which the book was reviewed carried more
than one review of the book
無關比較 刪
B. Whether the magazine publishes unsolicited book reviews as well as those
that it has commissioned
無關議題:unsolicited book
C. Whether in the event that a first review commissioned by the magazine
takes a clearly liberal position the magazine would make any efforts to
obtain further reviews
這題大概的意思就是再重複原文的前提 所以如果是的話:支持 否:反駁
D. Whether the book that was the subject of the two reviews was itself
written from a clearly conservative or a clearly liberal point of view
跟書的內容來源無關?? 不是很確定耶
E. Whether most of the readers of the magazine regularly read the book
reviews that the magazine publishes
主角:most of the readers錯誤 刪
請問我這樣想對嗎??
感謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 219.85.209.180
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):
GMAT 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
91
173