Re: [問題] CR-GWD-7-41

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者danyuchn (Javy)時間13年前 (2012/08/06 00:23)推噓1(1推 0噓 0→)

留言1則, 1人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)

※ 引述《chenemily (天天保持好心情)》之銘言： : Magazine Publisher: Our magazine does not have a liberal bias. It is true : that when a book review we had commissioned last year turned out to express : distinctly conservative views, we did not publish it until we had also : obtained a second review that took a strongly liberal position. Clearly, : however, our actions demonstrate not a bias in favor of liberal views but : rather a commitment to a balanced presentation of diverse opinions. : Determining which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the : cogency of the magazine publisher’s response? : 想請問這題不知道我想的對不對有錯請指正 > < : 因果:our actions demonstrate-->a commitment to a balanced presentation of : diverse opinions. premise：我們拿到一篇保守評論之後，還會再配一篇自由派的評論平衡 conclusion：我們是平衡報導，沒有偏自由派 : A. Whether any other magazines in which the book was reviewed carried more : than one review of the book : 無關比較刪橫向[同類]比較的無關 x : B. Whether the magazine publishes unsolicited book reviews as well as those : that it has commissioned : 無關議題:unsolicited book 沒有提到commissioned/unsolicited x : C. Whether in the event that a first review commissioned by the magazine : takes a clearly liberal position the magazine would make any efforts to : obtain further reviews : 這題大概的意思就是再重複原文的前提所以如果是的話:支持否:反駁使用evaluate/flaw題的「雙向檢測法」測試雙向是否會造就不同的結果若c選項為no-先拿到自由派的評論的話就不會再用保守派的評論平衡-偏自由-weaken yes-不管先拿到哪一派的報導都會等另外一派的報導來平衡-沒偏任一派-support : D. Whether the book that was the subject of the two reviews was itself : written from a clearly conservative or a clearly liberal point of view : 跟書的內容來源無關?? 不是很確定耶書的內容跟評論的關係與此題無關 x : E. Whether most of the readers of the magazine regularly read the book : reviews that the magazine publishes : 主角:most of the readers錯誤刪跟讀者看法無關 x dustin -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.45.75.73 ※ 編輯: danyuchn 來自: 114.45.75.73 (08/06 00:24)