Re: [SC. ] OG12 #26 脫節結構判題點

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者dounts (忘記過去)時間12年前 (2013/08/01 01:14)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)

留言0則, 0人參與討論串2/5 (看更多)

※ 引述《IEEE5566 (我不會被擊倒)》之銘言： : Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington : Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few : ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ : years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and : ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ : ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, : ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ : outnumbering her letters to anyone else. : (E) Dickinson, which were written over a period : beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage : to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before : Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber : 想請問 A選項中 ,outnumbering 這邊邏輯主語是 Emily Dickinson's letters : 錯的原因是,outnumbering 變成脫節結構沒有主要子句嗎?! : 謝謝既然是 OG 題目，那當然是以 OG 解釋為主 The main point of the sentence is that Dickinson’s letters to her sister-in-law outnumber her letters to anyone else. To emphasize this point, outnumber should be the main verb, 中文句意思路: Emily 寫給 Susan 的信件，是在 Susan 的 marriage 前幾年寫的，寫給 Susan 的信件數量比寫給其他任何人都要多 1. 主要的句意重點在 "數量"，而不是寫作的時間在 GMAT 中，main verb 應該放在 main clause，而不是變成 subordinate clause (outnumbering...) 的答案 (A) 2. 就算我們亞洲人抓不到句意重點，那應該也可以判斷，在前幾年寫的，跟數量多寡，沒有關係。沒有關連的兩個句子，就不該用 Ving 修飾。回應你說的 Ving 找邏輯主詞的部分，A 錯誤解釋如下: A The long, wordy opening clause gives too much emphasis to the period when Dickinson’s letters were written; it is unclear what outnumbering refers to. outnumbering 的用法，沒有答案 E 來的漂亮 outnumber --> 直接指向主詞 Emily Dickinson's letter 答案 (E) 非常明確，且句意也相當清楚 -- Dounts GMAT 資訊網站: http://ndxica.pixnet.net/blog -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 111.248.238.218 ※ 編輯: dounts 來自: 111.248.238.218 (08/01 01:21)