[問題] OG12-CR-84

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者s2crmbhh (迷途小書僮)時間13年前 (2013/02/01 11:55)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)

留言0則, 0人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)

前面雖然有板友解釋，但對修辭方式還有些疑慮 84. Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfi tes, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives. However, since there are several winemakers who add sulfi tes to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfi tes can drink wines produced by these winemakers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfi tes. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? (A) These winemakers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced by adding sulfi tes by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine. (B) Not all forms of sulfi te are equally likely to produce the allergic reaction. (C) Wine is the only beverage to which sulfi tes are commonly added. (D) Apart from sulfi tes, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction. (E) Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these winemakers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines. 正解E，只讀懂Ssulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced要修飾哪個字，就開始模糊了~ 還請大大解釋一下，因為前陣子念多CR，總覺得要翻譯成"S物質被酒廠製造時，不會製造出足夠的量，導致過敏"，produced前好歹加個and才能這樣解釋 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 64.134.20.89