Re: [SC. ] manhattan SC的parallelism疑問

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者 (祺祺)時間7年前 (2017/04/20 11:45), 編輯推噓2(2010)
留言12則, 2人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
1. The baseball game was exciting to us as (the baseball game was exciting) to pe ople sitting... 受詞間的比較 2.choose to seek rather than (to) face Og印象中有一題退休醫生的題目跟這題考點一樣 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.136.43.228 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/GMAT/M.1492659902.A.FF4.html

04/20 13:15, , 1F
Rather than 後面的to不可省吧
04/20 13:15, 1F

04/20 15:48, , 2F
V大:understood to是可以省略的(ov39) http://i.imgur
04/20 15:48, 2F

04/20 15:48, , 3F
.com/M3IGJd3.jpg
04/20 15:48, 3F

04/20 15:49, , 4F

04/20 23:17, , 5F
S大,這題可省略原因是其他選項更不好
04/20 23:17, 5F

04/20 23:18, , 6F
包含不平行及instead of 是rather than的相對錯誤選
04/20 23:18, 6F

04/20 23:18, , 7F
04/20 23:18, 7F

04/20 23:19, , 8F
但原po那題應該是*單一句子*;若原po有兩個選項分別
04/20 23:19, 8F

04/20 23:19, , 9F
是有to及沒to
04/20 23:19, 9F

04/20 23:20, , 10F
此時應該是有to比較好,但我自己gmat都還沒分手,希
04/20 23:20, 10F

04/20 23:20, , 11F
望各位多指點討論
04/20 23:20, 11F

04/20 23:20, , 12F
謝謝
04/20 23:20, 12F
文章代碼(AID): #1O-2w-_q (GMAT)
文章代碼(AID): #1O-2w-_q (GMAT)