Re: [新聞] 中國沿海製鞋業 十年內恐消失 已回收

看板Stock (股票)作者 (毒草打怪)時間12年前 (2013/07/31 11:31), 編輯推噓2(312)
留言6則, 6人參與, 最新討論串4/9 (看更多)
borriss :PPP是要修正匯率的假設 拿ppp會測不準一點都不奇怪 07/26 14:34 ============================================================================ Eurostat http://0rz.tw/FQbMK 歐盟統計局 Purchasing power parities (PPPs) 有意義 m PPPs make it possible to produce meaningful indicators (based on either price or volume) required for cross-country comparisons, truly reflecting the 跨國 比較 真實 反映 differences in the purchasing power of, for example, households. 購買力的不同 Monetary exchange rates cannot be used to compare the volumes of income or expenditure because they usually reflect more elements than just price differences, for example, volumes of financial transactions between currencies and expectations in the foreign exchange markets. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.161.160.228 ※ 編輯: leefengyuh 來自: 118.161.160.228 (07/31 11:47)

07/31 11:50, , 1F
"possible"
07/31 11:50, 1F

07/31 11:52, , 2F
才幾個字你也要翻5天? 這樣怎麼叫人不理盲不濫情?
07/31 11:52, 2F

07/31 12:14, , 3F
各國比較GDP,一般還是用名目的GDP,PPP僅供參考
07/31 12:14, 3F

07/31 13:00, , 4F
拿沒刻度的尺要量東西
07/31 13:00, 4F

07/31 15:18, , 5F
你看看我上篇說的中台對比就知道PPP不可靠了
07/31 15:18, 5F

07/31 19:47, , 6F
把ppp公式跟取樣方法拿出來不就知道誰對了
07/31 19:47, 6F
文章代碼(AID): #1H-8KRjy (Stock)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1H-8KRjy (Stock)