Re: [請教] 查埔查某
最近在 http://www.uoregon.edu/~delancey/papers/glt.html 這篇看到很有趣的敘述，
是關於藏語的：
The nominal suffixes, po/bo, pa/ba, mo, ma, have no other productive
use in modern Tibetan (except for -pa, which is the general
nominalizer), but they occur in a
large number of nouns, e.g. bu=mo ‘girl’, spo=bo ‘grandfather’
, rgyal=po ‘king’, rgyal=mo ‘queen’.
There is good evidence from earlier stages of the language to
suggest that these were once a
productive construction, being used widely to mark gender on nouns
and to derive nominalizations meaning ‘N which is/does V, V one’.
我在想「查某」、「查埔」會不會和這有關呢？
另外不曉得有沒有版友通藏語的，能說看看上面的引文敘述是否正確？
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.217.6
※ 編輯: as1986 來自: 140.112.217.6 (11/25 22:56)
※ as1986:轉錄至看板 Language 11/25 22:56
推
11/25 22:57, , 1F
11/25 22:57, 1F
推
11/25 23:00, , 2F
11/25 23:00, 2F
→
11/25 23:01, , 3F
11/25 23:01, 3F
→
11/25 23:02, , 4F
11/25 23:02, 4F
推
11/26 03:00, , 5F
11/26 03:00, 5F
推
11/26 03:04, , 6F
11/26 03:04, 6F
→
02/17 19:04, , 7F
02/17 19:04, 7F
→
02/17 19:07, , 8F
02/17 19:07, 8F
→
02/17 19:09, , 9F
02/17 19:09, 9F
→
02/17 19:11, , 10F
02/17 19:11, 10F
→
02/17 19:11, , 11F
02/17 19:11, 11F
推
11/18 23:21,
6年前
, 12F
11/18 23:21, 12F
→
11/18 23:21,
6年前
, 13F
11/18 23:21, 13F
→
11/18 23:21,
6年前
, 14F
11/18 23:21, 14F
→
11/18 23:21,
6年前
, 15F
11/18 23:21, 15F
推
11/19 00:12,
6年前
, 16F
11/19 00:12, 16F
推
11/19 00:20,
6年前
, 17F
11/19 00:20, 17F
→
11/19 00:20,
6年前
, 18F
11/19 00:20, 18F
討論串 (同標題文章)
TW-language 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
689
1490
106
189