南達科他州的墮胎法律 South Dakota's Abortio …

看板ask-why (知識奧秘)作者 (一期一會)時間17年前 (2008/12/06 18:48), 編輯推噓1(102)
留言3則, 1人參與, 最新討論串1/1
說到墮胎,我想到最近看到的一篇文章。這篇文章討論南達科他州的墮胎法律。 我想,不妨聽聽版友們對這法律的看法? 法律內容如下: ====== http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content-nw/full/359/21/2189/T1 The law includes the following provisions among disclosures that must be made to any pregnant woman before an abortion is performed: That the abortion will terminate the life of a whole, separate, unique, living human being; That the pregnant woman has an existing relationship with that unborn human being and that the relationship enjoys protection under the United States Constitution and under the laws of South Dakota; That by having an abortion, her existing relationship and her existing constitutional rights with regards to that relationship will be terminated; A description of all known medical risks of the procedure and statistically significant risk factors to which the pregnant woman would be subjected, including:Depression and related psychological distress; Increased risk of suicide ideation and suicide; A statement setting forth an accurate rate of deaths due to abortions, including all deaths in which the abortion procedure was a substantial contributing factor; All other known medical risks to the physical health of the woman, including the risk of infection, hemorrhage, danger to subsequent pregnancies, and infertility; The probable gestational age of the unborn child at the time the abortion is to be performed, and a scientifically accurate statement describing the development of the unborn child at that age; and the statistically significant medical risks associated with carrying her child to term compared to undergoing an induced abortion. ======= 嗯,如果版友們想看該篇文章的話, NEJM Volume 359:2189-2191 原文在此: http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/359/21/2189 -- 看哪,這論證是極好的:蘇格拉底是人,凡造物都難免要朽壞,所以末了我們知道,蘇格 拉底總要落到死裡面了。從亞里士多德以來的每一個邏輯學家,沒有一個不歡喜這個論證 的。亞里士多德明白的告訴了我們論證形式的道理,因了這個緣故,我們便尊他為邏輯學 的王。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.212.171 ※ 編輯: daze 來自: 140.112.212.171 (12/06 18:51)

12/07 04:31, , 1F
這段並不算是法條內容 只是一段legal disclosure(法律聲明)
12/07 04:31, 1F

12/07 04:32, , 2F
就是要墮胎者在行為前對各種潛在風險有所認知
12/07 04:32, 2F

12/07 04:32, , 3F
就類似香菸包裝上註明:"吸菸可能會導致癌症"
12/07 04:32, 3F
文章代碼(AID): #19EbXoi3 (ask-why)
文章代碼(AID): #19EbXoi3 (ask-why)