Re: [發音] sp, st, sk 念法是不是一定要唸成...
看板teaching (教材板)作者Topanga (Believe, dream, try)時間16年前 (2008/03/13 16:58)推噓6(6推 0噓 10→)留言16則, 8人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)
[p]-[b] 規則本身就有問題
是送氣音與不送氣音的區別
應該這麼說吧，
英文裡有聲無聲(voicing)是 distinctive feature
所以/p/無聲 /b/有聲 （發音上區別方式是聲帶會振動）
無聲子音在字首會送氣，但在s後是無聲不送氣
中文裡送氣非送氣(aspiration) 才是distinctive feature
也就是說 ㄅ和ㄆ差別只在送氣不送氣，兩者皆是無聲的
所以真的要理解的話
"sp" 裡面那個 [p] 是貼近中文的ㄅ而不是英文的 [b]
中文裡ㄅ與ㄆ相當於 sp 的"p" (unaspirated) 與 p elsewhere (aspirated)
用IPA（國際音標）注的話是 [p] 與 [ph] (h是 寫在右上小小的)
又 aspiration rule 所謂的 s/p/-->[p]
但 p 在 dominant position (typically syllable initial) 是發送氣 [ph]
export 重音在第二音節，也算是 dominant position
所以可能因此發 [ph]
(不妨問他如果是名詞重音在第一音節時p如何念的）
至於 discover 怎解...我就不知道了 囧
我唯一能想到的是 ambisyllabification
就是說 s同時歸做第一音節和第二音節.
--
Sara : You just don't like sports.
Grissom : That's not true. I've been a baseball fan my whole life.
Sara : Baseball. Well, that figures. All the stats.
Grissom : It's a beautiful sport.
Sara : Since when are you interested in beauty?
Grissom : Since I met you.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 210.70.89.231
推
03/13 17:08, , 1F
03/13 17:08, 1F
→
03/13 17:11, , 2F
03/13 17:11, 2F
→
03/13 17:11, , 3F
03/13 17:11, 3F
→
03/13 17:12, , 4F
03/13 17:12, 4F
推
03/13 18:03, , 5F
03/13 18:03, 5F
→
03/13 18:05, , 6F
03/13 18:05, 6F
推
03/13 20:02, , 7F
03/13 20:02, 7F
→
03/13 20:50, , 8F
03/13 20:50, 8F
→
03/13 20:52, , 9F
03/13 20:52, 9F
→
03/13 20:52, , 10F
03/13 20:52, 10F
推
03/13 21:11, , 11F
03/13 21:11, 11F
推
03/16 20:46, , 12F
03/16 20:46, 12F
推
04/02 22:12, , 13F
04/02 22:12, 13F
→
04/02 22:15, , 14F
04/02 22:15, 14F
→
04/02 22:17, , 15F
04/02 22:17, 15F
→
04/02 22:19, , 16F
04/02 22:19, 16F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇)：
teaching 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
12
27
