Re: part-time版17717篇的試翻

看板translator (翻譯接案)作者 (維寶)時間19年前 (2006/11/13 15:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串2/3 (看更多)
剛剛件主說 他寄給三個人 都是不同的試譯稿 所以我請他 看要怎麼處理了 如果有板友也是要試翻的話 可以聯絡一下件主喔~~~ ※ 引述《cuteyui (維寶)》之銘言: : 這是我收到的試翻稿~~~ : For instance, the PeopleSoft HRMS and Financials systems may be perceived : to be better than SAP's HRMS solution. And likewise, some may perceive : SAP's manufacturing and CRM systems as better than Peoplesoft's equivalents. : In this case these organizations may justify the purchase of an ERP system, : but choose to purchase the PeopleSoft HRMS and Financials modules from : Oracle, and their remaining applications form SAP. : This is very common in the retail sector, where even a mid-sized retailer : will have a discrete Point-of-Sale (POS)product and financials application, : then a series of specialised applications to handle business requirements : such as warehouse management, staff rostering, merchandising and logistics. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.163.226 cuteyui:轉錄至看板 part-time 11/13 15:06
文章代碼(AID): #15M1XU4t (translator)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #15M1XU4t (translator)