[字辨] verb "be" or verb "to be"?
大家好，請問一下：
「be動詞」的英文，有的寫verb "be" ，也有寫verb "to be"
前者沒問題；後者為何要多一個to？ 有什麼特別的意思嗎？
找到這個討論
http://forum.wordreference.com/threads/verb-be-or-verb-to-be.1986484/
裡頭比較關鍵的內容是：
'To' is not part of the verb, but in traditional grammar was wrongly analysed
as belonging to it. The word 'to' is a marker of an infinitive clause; it
belongs with the clause, not with the verb. So "the verb 'be'" is much more
accurate than the traditional "the verb 'to be'".
看完還是不太懂，說to屬於不定詞子句/片語（查了詞典，infinitive clause也可以叫做
infinitive phrase），不屬於該動詞。但「to屬於不定詞子句/片語」，跟be動詞
的關係是？
請教一下，謝謝。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.248.144.132
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1475414091.A.EF3.html
→
10/02 21:42, , 1F
10/02 21:42, 1F
→
10/02 21:43, , 2F
10/02 21:43, 2F
→
10/02 23:39, , 3F
10/02 23:39, 3F
→
10/02 23:40, , 4F
10/02 23:40, 4F
→
10/02 23:40, , 5F
10/02 23:40, 5F
→
10/02 23:40, , 6F
10/02 23:40, 6F
→
10/02 23:40, , 7F
10/02 23:40, 7F
→
10/02 23:40, , 8F
10/02 23:40, 8F
→
10/02 23:40, , 9F
10/02 23:40, 9F
→
10/02 23:40, , 10F
10/02 23:40, 10F
→
10/02 23:41, , 11F
10/02 23:41, 11F
→
10/02 23:41, , 12F
10/02 23:41, 12F
→
10/02 23:41, , 13F
10/02 23:41, 13F
→
10/02 23:41, , 14F
10/02 23:41, 14F
→
10/02 23:41, , 15F
10/02 23:41, 15F
Eng-Class 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
82
121