Re: [語文] OG-VR-CR56
※ 引述《denizee3 (妮 快瘋了!!!)》之銘言：
: 56. Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both grain and meat.
: However, as per capita income in Gortland has risen toward the world
: average，per capita consumption of meat has also risen toward the world
: average，and it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat.
: Therefore，since per capita income continues to rise，
: whereas domestic grain production will not increase，
: Gortland will soon have to import either grain or meat or both．
: Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
: (A) The total acreage devoted to grain production in Gortland
: will not decrease substantially
把NOT去掉,意思是這國家的種稻面機會大量下降,符合原文,無法反駁
: (B) The population of Gortland has remained relatively constant during
: the country's years of growing prosperity.
人口總數的變動不是題目重點,縱使人口下降,但每人平均食肉量大幅增加,也無法反駁
: (C) The per capita consumption of meat in Gortland is roughly the same
: across all income levels．
各階層間每人食肉量也不是重點,縱使各階層差異大,但總食肉量還是大增,也無法反駁
: (D) In Gortland, neither meat nor grain is subject to government price
: controls．
這選項....價格穩定與否不是重點
: (E) People in Gortland who increase their consumption of meat will not
: radically decrease their consumption of grain．
去掉NOT,國民增加食肉量同時,會大幅下降實用穀物量,所以並非會造成穀物不夠需進口
之情形發生,同時被減少的穀物又能拿來飼養產生更多肉品,所以肉品也未必會短缺
固反駁原文!!! 是反駁的反駁法
: 答案是E.
: 我看了後面的解釋..感覺好像稍微懂為什麼是E但是又好像沒有完全懂
: 是否請各位賢人能夠幫忙解釋一下呢?
: 感激不盡! <(__ __)>
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.252.80
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇)：
GMAT 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章