[問題] GWD 7-27

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者 (天天保持好心情)時間16年前 (2009/09/23 08:15), 編輯推噓0(005)
留言5則, 2人參與, 最新討論串1/1
A significant number of complex repair jobs carried out by Ace Repairs have to be reworked under the company’s warranty. The reworked jobs are invariably satisfactory. When initial repairs are inadequate, therefore, it is not because the mechanics lack competence; rather, there is clearly a level of focused concentration that complex repairs require that is elicited more reliably by rework jobs than by first-time jobs. The argument above assumes which of the following? A.There is no systematic difference in membership between the group of mechanics who do first-time jobs and the group of those who do rework jobs. B.There is no company that successfully competes with Ace Repairs for complex repair jobs. C.Ace Repairs’ warranty is good on first-time jobs but does not cover rework jobs. D.Ace Repairs does not in any way penalize mechanics who have worked on complex repair jobs that later had to be reworked. E.There is no category of repair jobs in which Ace Repairs invariably carries out first-time jobs satisfactorily. 答案A 請問一下 答案A取非是反駁it is not because the mechanics lack competence 這句嗎 這題不是很懂他在表達什麼 有人可以解釋一下嗎 謝 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 71.100.137.109

09/23 08:59, , 1F
這題原文認為「不是能力不足」而是「不專注」所以一次
09/23 08:59, 1F

09/23 09:00, , 2F
修不好。但是A答案去掉 not 之後,成為「兩次修理的人
09/23 09:00, 2F

09/23 09:00, , 3F
不同」,因而成為「另有他因」的反駁。加回not
09/23 09:00, 3F

09/23 09:01, , 4F
之後,就成為「他因反駁的反駁」,而為假設。
09/23 09:01, 4F

09/23 09:17, , 5F
09/23 09:17, 5F
文章代碼(AID): #1AkMY6HL (GMAT)
文章代碼(AID): #1AkMY6HL (GMAT)