Re: [SC. ] PP3-14與21

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者 (A級垂耳兔)時間15年前 (2011/02/25 00:28), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串2/4 (看更多)
※ 引述《Europe (extravaganza)》之銘言: : 14. : (As the former) chair of the planning board for 18 consecutive years and a : board member for 28 years, J. Phikill attended more than 400 meetings and : reviewed more than 700 rezoning applications. : 1) As the former : 2) Former : 3) As the : 答案為三 請問這邊考的文法是什麼? 為什麼只要有former都不可以 : 我覺得這三個答案都可以選 文法應該都對,只是邏輯句意上用the former不太make sense,the former表達前一任, 但是Philkill做了連續18任,所謂的前一任是對應這18年的哪一年,讀者會產生疑惑。 : 21. : The first detailed study of magpie attacks in Australia indicates that (by : the time they had reached adulthood, 98 percent of men and 75 percent of : women born in the country have been attacked by the birds.) : 2) by the time they reached adulthood, 98 percent of men and 75 percent of : women born in the country had been attacked by the birds. : 3) 98 percent of men and 75 percent of women who were born in the country, : by the time they reached adulthood had been attacked by the birds. : 答案為2 這裡的they指的是birds 還是men and women? 我自己選三 : 謝謝 應該是指主要子句的主詞98 percent of men and 75 percent women,答案三有幾個問 題點: 1. 限定的被動分詞born...是短的限定分詞,不要補出關係代名詞和be動詞who were, 這是GMAC設計錯誤答案典型招式,這樣改只是讓句子結構複雜化 2. 修飾語誤置,by the time...原來是時間副詞擺在主要子句前修飾主要子句動詞 attack,在第三個答案讀者會以為修飾動詞born -- A兔GMAT作戰中心 http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/tootoo5478/ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.25.225.238 ※ 編輯: tootoobenee 來自: 114.25.227.100 (03/01 01:09)
文章代碼(AID): #1DPeShjq (GMAT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
1
7
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 4 篇):
1
7
文章代碼(AID): #1DPeShjq (GMAT)