Re: SC-PP3-192

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者tootoobenee (A級垂耳兔)時間15年前 (2011/07/07 00:12)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)

留言0則, 0人參與討論串2/4 (看更多)

※ 引述《chenemily (天天保持好心情)》之銘言： : In 1988, the Council on Economic Priorities began publishing Shopping for a : Better World, with the simple thesis of consumers having the power to change : companies by the simple expedient of refusing to buy. : A. with the simple thesis of consumers having : B. which had the simple thesis of consumers having : C. where the thesis was simple: consumers having : D. with a thesis that is a simple one: consumers have : E. whose thesis was simple: consumers have : 想請問一下在Manhattan Ron大神說 : remember that of NOUN VERBing is an incorrect construction if the "VERBing" : is actually meant to be the object of the preposition. : in this case, the consumers' HAVING the power is the actual thesis, not the : consumers themselves, so "of consumers having" is wrong. : for instance: : i took a picture of dolphins frolicking in the surf --> correct, since the : picture was of dolphins (not "of frolicking") : 請問這是什麼意思看了好久不是很懂這是在考邏輯表達問題，因為在A選項句子還原很像是以下這句: thesis of the fact that consumers have the power... 但是在下面舉例的句子還原卻是這樣: a picture of dolphins that frolicked in the surf. 看出差別了嗎? 上面那句是用獨立分詞結構整個fact修飾of前面的名詞，下面那句是 dolphins修飾of前面的名詞，在GMAT標準英文中是不會用獨立分詞結構修飾of前面的名詞，這就是為何Ron大神說if the "VERBing" is actually meant to be the object of the preposition. 希望沒講錯，參考參考也歡迎討論~ -- A兔GMAT作戰中心 http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/tootoo5478/ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 221.120.6.16