Re: SC-PP3-192

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者Komake (Be True To Yourself)時間15年前 (2011/07/07 00:46)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)

留言0則, 0人參與討論串4/4 (看更多)

※ 引述《chenemily (天天保持好心情)》之銘言： : In 1988, the Council on Economic Priorities began publishing Shopping for a : Better World, with the simple thesis of consumers having the power to change : companies by the simple expedient of refusing to buy. : A. with the simple thesis of consumers having : B. which had the simple thesis of consumers having : C. where the thesis was simple: consumers having : D. with a thesis that is a simple one: consumers have : E. whose thesis was simple: consumers have : 想請問一下在Manhattan Ron大神說 : remember that of NOUN VERBing is an incorrect construction if the "VERBing" : is actually meant to be the object of the preposition. : in this case, the consumers' HAVING the power is the actual thesis, not the : consumers themselves, so "of consumers having" is wrong. : for instance: : i took a picture of dolphins frolicking in the surf --> correct, since the : picture was of dolphins (not "of frolicking") : 請問這是什麼意思看了好久不是很懂我試著解釋看看如果有錯還請指正 :) Ron所表達的是如果 VERBing 本身就是 preposition 中的 object （以原文來看即 having 是 the thesis 所要指的 object）那麼 of NOUN VERBing 這樣的結構就會有問題因為在 "of" 前的字會修飾在其後的字（the thesis 會指到 consumers 而不是 having 即 the thesis of consumers） for instance 給的例句中 the pictures 指的是 dolphins 而不是 frolicking 所以沒有問題其實我也覺得這樣的解釋方式有一點難懂我自己的做法是先把 ACD 三個選項刪除（,with 基本上修飾前面整個子句 where應該代替地點但前面句子沒有出現地點） BE 比較選短的（誤）好啦應該說 B 的寫法使得 having 後面接的子句單獨修飾 consumers 留下 which had the simple thesis of consumers 這樣奇怪的句子（也就是 Ron 在討論串中的第二篇回答所指出的）所以 E 才是正確答案可能還是解釋得有點亂不清楚的部分再一起討論看看吧 :p -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.160.110.73