Re: [寫作班] Christmas / Physheepy

看板ST-English (英文科技寫作)作者 (Dee)時間17年前 (2007/12/27 07:37), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串3/3 (看更多)

12/24 02:38,
I check the definition in the Longman dictionary.
12/24 02:38

12/24 02:42,
It says "dress" is an uncountable noun when it
12/24 02:42

12/24 02:44,
refers to clothes for men of a particular type
12/24 02:44

12/24 02:46,
So I use "dress" here instead of "dresses"
12/24 02:46

12/24 02:48,
I'm a little confused. Maybe we can have further
12/24 02:48

12/24 02:49,
discussions about it.
12/24 02:49
This may be a bit confusing. Perhaps some examples would help. 1. When it refers to "clothes for men of a particular type", it could be used like this: The gladiators wore battle dress. Here, "dress" refers to a distinctive style of clothing for a particular category of people, and it is, indeed, noncountable. 2. It can also refer to clothing in general, but usually in the sense that it is a collection of clothing, for example: He is fussy about his dress. It means the man is fussy about any and all of his clothes or apparel, or "wardrobe", or about the way he dresses. It is still noncountable. 3. When "dress" refers to an actual piece of clothing, literally, it is a countable noun. Ex: one dress, two dresses // In the case of people wearing fancy dresses for a party, it is not 1. because it is not specific to a type of clothing, and it is not 2. because it is not specific to a particular collection. "Dresses" literally refers to physical, material pieces of clothing. However, dresses are for women only. Perhaps the substitute here would just be "clothes" or "apparel". -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 99.231.10.180
文章代碼(AID): #17SkMqhe (ST-English)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #17SkMqhe (ST-English)