[筆譯] 0.7/字_英譯中_教育類/一萬字

看板translator (翻譯接案)作者pttdouble (多多綠)時間12年前 (2014/04/30 12:22)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)

留言0則, 0人參與討論串1/1

[必]我已經讀過且瞭解置底版規、費率、發文必讀公告，並願意遵守規定：yes ────────────────────────────────────── [必]工作量： 9747字(word計算實際更少點) [必]工作報酬： 0.7元/字 6822元直接算6900元 [必]涉及語言：英譯中 [必]所屬領域：教育/公共行政 [必]文件類型：論文摘要/期刊 [必]截稿日：本周日晚或周一白天 [必]應徵期限：明天中午 [必]聯絡方式：站內信 [必]付費方式：先交一半匯款一半, 完稿確定沒問題後的隔天付全額。 ────────────────────────────────────── [選]工作要求：專業禮貌細心 [選]參考段落：（提供部分段落讓譯者評估難度，若未提供請勿刪除） [選]試譯文：（100-200字） [選]其他事項：請提供簡單學經歷/電話email連絡若人多不一一回覆請見諒謝謝 ────────────────────────────────────── 試譯 Respondent, hired for a fixed term of one academic year to teach at a state university, was informed without explanation that he would not be rehired for the ensuing year. A statute provided that all state university teachers would be employed initially on probation and that only after four years' continuous service would teachers achieve permanent employment "during efficiency and good behavior," with procedural protection against separation. University rules gave a nontenured teacher "dismissed" before the end of the year some opportunity for review of the "dismissal," but provided that no reason need be given for nonretention of a nontenured teacher, and no standards were specified for reemployment. Respondent brought this action claiming deprivation of his Fourteenth Amendment rights, alleging infringement of (1) his free speech right because the true reason for his nonretention was his criticism of the university administration, and (2) his procedural due process right because of the university's failure to advise him of the reason for its decision. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.224.99.235 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/translator/M.1398831723.A.FC6.html