[文法] 情態助動詞

看板Eng-Class (英文板)作者 (accro)時間8年前 (2017/09/14 20:01), 8年前編輯推噓0(0028)
留言28則, 2人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
想請問各位AZAR 4th advanced的P208這幾句: 1.When I was a child, I could climb to the roof of my house and [see] all the other houses and streets. []用原形是因為有and表對等連接詞,前面could後面原V後面也要? 2.You can have a very good time as a tourist in my country. My country has many different climates, so you had better plan ahead before you [come]. []用原形是因為這句本來就是現在式的時態所以用現在簡單嗎? 還是因為had better 在前面的關係呢? 3.When you visit a big city in my country, you must pay attention to your wallet when you are in a browded place because a thief [] try to steal it. 這句[]原本是給maybe,可是是錯的,是為什麼呢? 不是adv後可以接V嗎? 另外would 可以用在[]中嗎? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.38.201.173 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1505390503.A.84F.html

09/14 20:52, , 1F
請問一下,為何第三句可以有兩個when?不懂為何會有第二個
09/14 20:52, 1F

09/14 20:52, , 2F
when
09/14 20:52, 2F

09/14 20:55, , 3F

09/14 20:55, , 4F
第二頁,Exercise 42,第十二題的解答。
09/14 20:55, 4F
原句的確是兩個when沒錯,這樣算是課本有誤嗎? 還是都可以呢?

09/14 21:49, , 5F
1.如果是改成could see會冒出很微妙的詮釋,很多人
09/14 21:49, 5F

09/14 21:50, , 6F
可能會讀成"我可以爬上屋頂,而且,我可以看到其他
09/14 21:50, 6F

09/14 21:50, , 7F
屋子和街道"
09/14 21:50, 7F

09/14 22:00, , 8F
3.因為maybe是sentence adverb
09/14 22:00, 8F

09/14 22:02, , 9F
如果是改成maybe a thief would try to steal it就
09/14 22:02, 9F

09/14 22:02, , 10F
通了
09/14 22:02, 10F

09/14 22:19, , 11F
(當然更省事的話就直接用may或might就好
09/14 22:19, 11F

09/14 22:29, , 12F
2.had better通常接著談某個未來或現在的時間點你該
09/14 22:29, 12F

09/14 22:29, , 13F
做的事情,後方用before接present tense很常見
09/14 22:29, 13F

09/14 22:30, , 14F
那個before說的事情通常會給聽話者一種"這件事很高
09/14 22:30, 14F

09/14 22:31, , 15F
機會會發生"的感覺
09/14 22:31, 15F

09/14 22:31, , 16F
像是cambridge字典上的這個例子:
09/14 22:31, 16F

09/14 22:31, , 17F
It’s five o’clock. I’d better go now before
09/14 22:31, 17F

09/14 22:32, , 18F
the traffic gets too bad.
09/14 22:32, 18F

09/14 22:39, , 19F
補充一下,關於maybe還有一點可以注意,就是maybe
09/14 22:39, 19F

09/14 22:39, , 20F
通常表達的是說話者自己也不太確定某某事情如何如何
09/14 22:39, 20F

09/14 22:39, , 21F
,它後方是可以接任何型態的句子的
09/14 22:39, 21F

09/14 22:40, , 22F
(這也是為什麼它在字典上被歸作sentence adverb
09/14 22:40, 22F

09/14 22:41, , 23F
這也是為什麼一開始那個句子不適合單獨用maybe的原
09/14 22:41, 23F

09/14 22:42, , 24F
因,因為你給的那個句子在談的是某個條件下才會成立
09/14 22:42, 24F

09/14 22:42, , 25F
的事情,如果你不用任何modal verb就接maybe會變成
09/14 22:42, 25F

09/14 22:43, , 26F
你像是在說某個事實發生了,但你不確定是不是這樣
09/14 22:43, 26F

09/14 22:44, , 27F
但這明顯不會是原本句子要說的事情(它明顯不是在說
09/14 22:44, 27F

09/14 22:44, , 28F
事實上可能有某個小偷如何如何
09/14 22:44, 28F
謝謝SUNNY大,小弟不才,maybe還是有點無法理解,cambridge用可能但沒把握的意思解釋, may/might也是也許的意思,感覺只有詞性差別而已 ※ 編輯: accro (114.38.201.173), 09/15/2017 10:26:12 ※ 編輯: accro (114.38.201.173), 09/15/2017 10:59:26
文章代碼(AID): #1Pkc-dXF (Eng-Class)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1Pkc-dXF (Eng-Class)