Re: [語文] GWD CR

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者 (原來改不了?)時間17年前 (2008/11/02 10:33), 編輯推噓1(105)
留言6則, 3人參與, 最新討論串2/10 (看更多)
※ 引述《CGHS13 (.......)》之銘言: : The traditional treatment of step infections has been a seven-day course of : antibiotics, either penicillin or erythromycin. However, since many patients : stop taking those drugs within three days, reinfection is common in cases where : these drugs are prescirbed. A new antibiotic require only a three-day course of : treatment. Therefore, reinfection will probably be less common in cases where : the new antibiotic is prescibed than in cases where either penicillin or : erythromycin is prescribed. : which of the following, if true, most strength the argument? : A Some of people who are allergic to penicillin are likely to be allergic to : the antibiotic : B A course of treatment with the new antibiotic costs about the same as a : course of treatment with either penicilline or erythromycin : C The new anitibiotic has been shown to be effective in eradicating bacterial : infection othe than step : D Some physicians have already begun to prescibe the new antibiotic instead of : penicillin or erythrimycin for the treatment of some strep infections : E Regardless of whether they take a traditional antibiotic or the new one, : most patients feel fully recovered after taking the drug for three days : ANS: E : why? 因為原題提到traditional療法是7天course,but病人常三天內就懶的再吃所以病復發 但是新藥是三天course 所以選項E可以支持題目 其實舊的跟新的藥都是吃三天就好,只是病人覺得七天很煩,還沒三天就不吃了 那現在新藥只有三天的療程,病人可能就比較願意接受。(重點是他們病會好) SO這樣的療程可能比較common -- 喜歡跟愛是不一樣的 喜歡是盪鞦韆 可以自得其樂 不需要別人的回應 愛是翹翹板 需要一個人坐在對面與你互動 貼近你內心的感覺... -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 203.67.14.140 ※ 編輯: sunnyE 來自: 203.67.14.140 (11/02 10:34) ※ 編輯: sunnyE 來自: 203.67.14.140 (11/02 10:35)

11/02 11:19, , 1F
TKS~~~~~^^
11/02 11:19, 1F

11/02 11:48, , 2F
可以問一下D的解釋未啥不對嗎?
11/02 11:48, 2F

11/02 11:52, , 3F
想請問題目要支持的結論不是應該為是否復發狀況變得比較少
11/02 11:52, 3F

11/02 11:53, , 4F
那E選項新舊藥都一樣三天會好那復發情形不是都一樣很少嘛?
11/02 11:53, 4F

11/02 11:54, , 5F
我一開始的想法跟你一樣ㄝ@@ 所以才會選D....
11/02 11:54, 5F

11/02 12:16, , 6F
我認同E 他題目只是推論說 不管是否新舊 可以降低就好
11/02 12:16, 6F
文章代碼(AID): #193H66tF (GMAT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
17年前, 11/02
以下文章回應了本文
1
3
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 10 篇):
2
6
17年前, 11/11
2
3
17年前, 11/08
1
2
17年前, 11/08
1
3
17年前, 11/06
0
1
1
3
1
6
17年前, 11/02
文章代碼(AID): #193H66tF (GMAT)