Re: [語文] GWD CR

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者Vinicks (信將)時間17年前 (2008/11/02 13:57)推噓0(0推 0噓 1→)

留言1則, 1人參與討論串4/10 (看更多)

※ 引述《CGHS13 (.......)》之銘言： : The traditional treatment of step infections has been a seven-day course of : antibiotics, either penicillin or erythromycin. However, since many patients : stop taking those drugs within three days, reinfection is common in cases where : these drugs are prescirbed. A new antibiotic require only a three-day course of : treatment. Therefore, reinfection will probably be less common in cases where : the new antibiotic is prescibed than in cases where either penicillin or : erythromycin is prescribed. : which of the following, if true, most strength the argument? : A Some of people who are allergic to penicillin are likely to be allergic to : the antibiotic : B A course of treatment with the new antibiotic costs about the same as a : course of treatment with either penicilline or erythromycin : C The new anitibiotic has been shown to be effective in eradicating bacterial : infection othe than step : D Some physicians have already begun to prescibe the new antibiotic instead of : penicillin or erythrimycin for the treatment of some strep infections : E Regardless of whether they take a traditional antibiotic or the new one, : most patients feel fully recovered after taking the drug for three days : ANS: E : why? : 不管吃新藥或是傳統的藥大多數的人都會覺得3天後就好了? : 這樣有支持到結論-新的藥可以降低再次感染的機會? 題目說到下列哪個選項最可以支持文章的論點而文章的論點是說: 因此再次復發的機率在使用新藥的人會比使用舊藥的人還要得低..... (D)選項:已經有些醫生開始開新藥給病人吃....所以呢?? 開新藥不代表新藥就會使再次復發的機率低....簡單來說(D)選項有點離題 (E)選項:不管他們是吃新藥還是舊藥大多數病人"感覺"吃三天後得到充分的恢復但舊藥實際上療程是七天所以他們還是會再次感染而新藥標榜著吃剛好吃三天就好因此剛好符合病人們覺得三天就好因為新藥剛好也是三天療程就好因此感染機率降低 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.127.197.112