[語文] GWD CR

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者 (結束即是開始)時間17年前 (2008/11/11 17:31), 編輯推噓2(204)
留言6則, 2人參與, 最新討論串10/10 (看更多)
GWD2-Q32: Press Secretary: Our critics claim that the President's recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts. But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors. So the President's choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics. Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary's argument depends? A.Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. B.The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party. C.The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future. D.The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President's party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties. E.Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects. A:(B) 我是選(E),一開始會馬上把(B)刪掉,它只是說大部分被刪除的區域非執政黨管轄 感覺跟最後的"not partisan politics"沒有多大關連。 我選(E)是因為the press secretary引用此report所以為了強化此report的正確性 說明反對黨並無把這份report當作評論來源,所以會認為執政黨是在處罰他們,如 果他們去看了這份report,或許會意識到:"it is wastful not political"。 還是(E)可以當推論,並不適合當假設? (像這種assumption常會無頭緒@@") 謝謝善心人士回答^^ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 122.118.164.168

11/11 18:25, , 1F
前面講被刪的是非執政黨管轄 後面講某議案被刪是因為有其
11/11 18:25, 1F

11/11 18:25, , 2F
他因素而非只是政治因素 所以這個議案當然是非執政區域
11/11 18:25, 2F

11/11 18:26, , 3F
提出來的才會這樣講啊~ 要撇清說不是政治因素
11/11 18:26, 3F

11/11 19:56, , 4F
這題前陣子才討論過,我有推文解釋,但那篇被原PO
11/11 19:56, 4F

11/11 19:58, , 5F
刪了... 簡單來說:被取消的計畫都浪費,浪費的不一定
11/11 19:58, 5F

11/11 19:58, , 6F
都被取消 你用這想法再思考一下B選項 應該就能想通
11/11 19:58, 6F
文章代碼(AID): #196L3x0i (GMAT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 10 之 10 篇):
2
6
17年前, 11/11
2
3
17年前, 11/08
1
2
17年前, 11/08
1
3
17年前, 11/06
0
1
1
3
1
6
17年前, 11/02
文章代碼(AID): #196L3x0i (GMAT)