Re: [語文] PP2-CR 40 假設題的解法
※ 引述《fshy (GMATing)》之銘言:
: 目前假設題的作法我都是有not取掉not, 或沒not補上not來當反駁題作.
: 可是今天做PP2時做到此題. 此題看別人的解法算是"搭橋".
: 但我ㄧ開始當反駁題做確非常的繞(即取非) ~ 花了很多時間
: 所以請問ㄧ下各位神人, 當您們看到假設題時. 您們的作法是
: (1) 全部先取非當反駁題做. 有些雖然繞但還是解的出來
: (2) 全部先取非, 等無法順利解時在從正面思考下手
: (3) 讀完題目都就知道是用搭橋方式解或是當反駁
: 我現在是無法用(3)方法, 頭腦沒這麼靈活在短時間判斷出來.
: 現在全部的假設題都當反駁先做.可今天此題就踢了鐵板 ~
: 還是這題當反駁也是可以很快?
: 謝謝 ~
我之前看CD有人是這麼解的:
b:那些被開單的司機平時就更容易超速。
如果b取非就成了:被開單的司機平時不那麼容易超速。
所以 那些被開單的有radar的司機可能本身很多時候都沒有超速,只是這些司機運氣不好
,好不容易超速就被逮了,那就削弱了結論。
: 註: "搭橋"就"類似" 題目A-B, B-C, 然後答案找連結.
: A recent report determined that although only three percent of drivers
: on Maryland highways equipped their vehicles with radar detectors,
: thirty-three percent of all vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed
: limit were equipped with them. Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles
: with radar detectors are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly
: than are drivers who do not.
: The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions?
: (A) Drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are less likely
: to be ticketed for exceeding the speed limit than are drivers who do not.
: (B) Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely
: to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed.
: (C) The number of vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit
: was greater than the number of vehicles that were equipped with radar
: detectors.
: (D) Many of the vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit
: were ticketed more than once in the time period covered by the report.
: (E) Drivers on Maryland highways exceeded the speed limit more often than did
: drivers on other state highways not covered in the report.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.4.234
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):
GMAT 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
55
128