Re: SC-GWD-1-16
※ 引述《chenemily (天天保持好心情)》之銘言：
: GWD1-Q16:
: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the
: presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any
: previous election.
: A. a greater proportion than it was
: B. a greater proportion than
: C. a greater proportion than they have been
我想再請問這題
看了Ron & A2 的解釋 有些地方不是很懂
Ron說 A錯 是因為
it are "spending" and "the presidential campaign of 1992".
clearly, neither of these is an appropriate antecedent, so this choice is
just wrong.
這邊是沒啥問題!!
然後 C錯
"they" would have to refer to "soaring television costs", by elimination:
there aren't any other plural nouns.
literally, this makes no sense, since television costs weren't "soaring" in
OTHER elections.
(note that you MUST take the pronoun to stand for "soaring television costs";
you are NOT allowed to extract just "television costs" and pretend that the
pronoun stands only for that.)
請問為什麼 Ron說會說They 不能指代"television costs"??
我的意思是說 "they"="soaring television costs" 很合理 可是為啥
會有指代 "television costs"的可能!!!
然後 A2是說
a greater proportion是half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992這
個名詞的同位語資訊.
其實就是兩個時期的proportion在做比較, a proportion是單數, 所以要也是補出it
was, 另外比較級是形容詞greater, 對應be adj的比較結構, 所以不會補出助動詞
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
請問這邊是什麼意思?????
好暈阿!!! 有高手可以解釋一下嗎
感恩
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 27.105.19.53
討論串 (同標題文章)
GMAT 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章