Re: SC-GWD-1-16

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者andyanyu (andy)時間14年前 (2011/11/20 22:17)推噓0(0推 0噓 5→)

留言5則, 1人參與討論串3/4 (看更多)

※ 引述《chenemily (天天保持好心情)》之銘言： ※ 引述《chenemily (天天保持好心情)》之銘言： : GWD1-Q16: : Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the : presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any : previous election. : A. a greater proportion than it was : B. a greater proportion than : C. a greater proportion than they have been 我想再請問這題看了Ron & A2 的解釋有些地方不是很懂 Ron說 A錯是因為 it are "spending" and "the presidential campaign of 1992". clearly, neither of these is an appropriate antecedent, so this choice is just wrong. 這邊是沒啥問題!! 然後 C錯 "they" would have to refer to "soaring television costs", by elimination: there aren't any other plural nouns. literally, this makes no sense, since television costs weren't "soaring" in OTHER elections. (note that you MUST take the pronoun to stand for "soaring television costs"; you are NOT allowed to extract just "television costs" and pretend that the pronoun stands only for that.) 請問為什麼 Ron說會說They 不能指代"television costs"?? 我的意思是說 "they"="soaring television costs" 很合理可是為啥會有指代 "television costs"的可能!!! ---------------對不起先把A2的刪掉了----------------------- television costs weren't "soaring" in OTHER elections. 我想RON的意思是 1992 的cost 跟已前的cost不一樣更清楚一點是說雖然數字可能一樣，但實質上是不一樣的這觀念我最近剛好有整理(也是從RON那裡學來的) 如果有錯要麻煩各位糾正了例一： GWD 15-34 Between 1990 and 2000 the global economy grew more than it did during the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture to 1950. A. Between 1990 and 2000 the global economy grew more than it did during the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture B. Between 1990 and 2000 the growth of the global economy was more than that during 10,000 years, from when agriculture began C. The growth of the global economy between 1990 and 2000 exceeds that which had been for 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture OA:A 例二 PP2-131 Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel-efficient now than at any time in their production history. (A) small cars more fuel-efficient now than at any time in their (C) small cars that are more fuel-efficient than those at any other time in OA: C 為何例一的(A)可以用it，而例二(A)不能用their? --"that"代的名詞是前面出面過，但要把之放在不同的時空背景來做比較 --"it"、"they”也可以拿來比較，但必須是完全一模一樣的東西。例一，global economy 不管在何時名字都一樣，本質也一樣。例二，”現在的車子”不等於”以前的車子”，雖然都是car，but obviously different.所以不可以用their 因此我想RON的意思應該跟例二的汽車一樣~ 個人淺見 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 111.248.53.67