Re: [問題] OV-CR-69

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者danyuchn (Javy)時間13年前 (2012/08/15 14:06)推噓2(2推 0噓 3→)

留言5則, 2人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)

※ 引述《heine564 (築夢踏實)》之銘言： : When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable income, a vicious : cycle results. Tax evasion forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates, which : causes the tax burden on nonevading taxpayers to become heavier. This, in : turn, encourages even more taxpayers to evade income taxes by hiding taxable : income. : The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the : following were true? 問前提。循環式：逃稅-政府收不到錢-提高稅率-高稅率讓更多人逃稅-政府再度提高稅率... : (A) An increase in tax rates tends to function as an incentive for taxpayers : to try to increase their pretax incomes. "提高收入"x提高的稅率=政府收到更多的錢這樣政府就不會再度提高稅率循環不會發生。 : (B) Some methods for detecting tax evaders, and thus recovering some tax : revenue lost through evasion, bring in more than they cost, but their success : rate varies from year to year. 1.抓逃漏稅的成功率"varies"，這種模糊的詞基本上不能證明什麼難以拿來當做前提況且跟這個題目無關 2.抓逃漏稅(扣掉成本後)可以補回來一些錢，政府就比較不會因為缺錢再度提高稅率。 : (C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain : level of revenue, they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost : through evasion. "制定稅率時沒有考慮到'逃稅'這個因素" 將此取非->若是有預先考慮到逃稅這個因素而制定稅率，那麼當逃稅發生時，因為這個因素已經預先被考慮了，所以稅率不會因此再調整。取非反駁結論 -選c : (D) No one who routinely hides some taxable income can be induced by a : lowering of tax rates to stop hiding such income unless fines for evaders are : raised at the same time. 另外一面的循環是否成立與題目無關。 ex.給獎勵學生會認真讀書不代表給處罰學生會懶惰不讀書 : (E) Taxpayers do not differ from each other with respect to the rate of : taxation that will cause them to evade taxes. taxpayers在題目中被視為一個整體，沒有必要比較taxpayers之間個體的關係。 Dustin -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 1.162.9.46