Re: [請益]支持同性伴侶領養小孩嗎？
※ 引述《deathmare510 (阿彥)》之銘言：
: 為何這世界的異性戀佔大多數呢？我認為是因為人們在幼年時期，漸漸的認知到自己的性
: 別角色，從而去模仿男生或女生的行為，產生我是男（女）生，應該要喜歡女（男）生，
: 這種想法。簡單來說，我認為孩童在幼年時性別角色認知錯誤，才會變成同性戀（歡迎糾
: 正），有人可能會反駁同性戀是因為男（女）生的靈魂跑到女（男）生的身體，但是性別
: 的不同是身體上的差別，靈魂本身並沒有性別之分，再說有沒有靈魂這種東西也是一大問
: 號。如果同性伴侶領養了小孩，小孩在成長的過程會模仿大人的舉止，造成下ㄧ代原本是
: 異性戀的兒童變成同性戀的機率極高，我認為這樣對那些孩童是很不公平的。不知道各位
: 鄉民怎麼看？
關於同性戀父母收養子女，是否比較容易變成同性戀者
順帶也提到歧視問題
美國精神醫學會已經有正式的對外報告
http://www.apa.org/about/policy/parenting.aspx
以下是段落轉錄，以色標指出你想了解的部分
As the social visibility and legal status of lesbian and gay parents has
increased, three major concerns about the influence of lesbian and gay
parents on children have been often voiced (Falk, 1994; Patterson, Fulcher &
Wainright, 2002). One is that the children of lesbian and gay parents will
experience more difficulties in the area of sexual identity than children of
heterosexual parents. For instance, one such concern is that children brought
up by lesbian mothers or gay fathers will show disturbances in gender
identity and/or in gender role behavior. A second category of concerns
involves aspects of children's personal development other than sexual
identity. For example, some observers have expressed fears that children in
the custody of gay or lesbian parents would be more vulnerable to mental
breakdown, would exhibit more adjustment difficulties and behavior problems,
or would be less psychologically healthy than other children. A third
category of concerns is that children of lesbian and gay parents will
experience difficulty in social relationships. For example, some observers
have expressed concern that children living with lesbian mothers or gay
fathers will be stigmatized, teased, or otherwise victimized by peers.
Another common fear is that children living with gay or lesbian parents will
be more likely to be sexually abused by the parent or by the parent's friends
or acquaintances.
Results of social science research have failed to confirm any of these
concerns about children of lesbian and gay parents (Patterson, 2000, 2004a;
Perrin, 2002; Tasker, 1999). Research suggests that sexual identities
(including gender identity, gender-role behavior, and sexual orientation)
develop in much the same ways among children of lesbian mothers as they do
among children of heterosexual parents (Patterson, 2004a). Studies of other
aspects of personal development (including personality, self-concept, and
conduct) similarly reveal few differences between children of lesbian mothers
and children of heterosexual parents (Perrin, 2002; Stacey & Biblarz, 2001;
Tasker, 1999). However, few data regarding these concerns are available for
children of gay fathers (Patterson, 2004b). Evidence also suggests that
children of lesbian and gay parents have normal social relationships with
peers and adults (Patterson, 2000, 2004a; Perrin, 2002; Stacey & Biblarz,
2001; Tasker, 1999; Tasker & Golombok, 1997). The picture that emerges from
research is one of general engagement in social life with peers, parents,
family members, and friends. Fears about children of lesbian or gay parents
being sexually abused by adults, ostracized by peers, or isolated in
single-sex lesbian or gay communities have received no scientific support.
Overall, results of research suggest that the development, adjustment, and
well-being of children with lesbian and gay parents do not differ markedly
from that of children with heterosexual parents.
以上內容，你可以仔細閱讀研究的報告，不要再去查什麼網友或人們的答案了
另外，性向是天生的，也是已經有眾多的研究報告支持
若你有興趣，我也可以再找給你
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 115.43.55.138
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/ask-why/M.1495718558.A.165.html
※ 編輯: Wengboyu (115.43.55.138), 05/25/2017 21:26:36
→
05/26 01:05, , 1F
05/26 01:05, 1F
→
05/26 01:05, , 2F
05/26 01:05, 2F
→
05/26 01:05, , 3F
05/26 01:05, 3F
→
05/26 01:11, , 4F
05/26 01:11, 4F
→
05/26 01:11, , 5F
05/26 01:11, 5F
→
05/26 01:11, , 6F
05/26 01:11, 6F
推
05/26 01:36, , 7F
05/26 01:36, 7F
→
05/26 01:37, , 8F
05/26 01:37, 8F
→
05/26 01:42, , 9F
05/26 01:42, 9F
→
05/26 01:42, , 10F
05/26 01:42, 10F
→
05/26 01:42, , 11F
05/26 01:42, 11F
你想要相信誰，我沒辦法多說什麼
風向新聞一向是個色彩很鮮明的媒體，而它引用的是一個宗教期刊
如同Ebergies所說，那並沒有足夠的credit，更何況根本不是科學期刊
也就是說它沒有經過其他生、心理科學研究者的peer review
那有什麼好說的? 假造或選擇性忽略某些數據，根本無從檢驗起
它呈現給你的就是他想讓你看到的
又或者只是通過的宗教研究者的peer review
也許會退件或刪除一些他們認為「不合適」的內容
另外，那位霍普金斯的「學者」(我甚至不知道他夠不夠格)，如果我沒記錯
他的前同事(?)好像還為此事在網路上架起網頁，去反駁質疑他，一時間找不到網頁
我引列的是美國精神醫學會對外發布的，好歹也是全美的精神科醫師學會
它所引的社會、心理學研究報告，都來自有頭有臉的科學期刊
也不是只有一篇這樣講，而是數篇都支持一樣的結果
你若想要支持同性戀是後天的，就去新英格蘭醫學期刊、心理學相關期刊
或者生理學研究的期刊裡，找出起碼有2-3篇支持同性戀是後天的
才會有一些說服力
而且你可能有什麼誤會，美國精神醫學會並沒有說同性戀是先天或後天
它只是澄清了雙親的性取向並不會影響受領養孩子的性取向
而就算同性戀是後天的，那也不影響同志雙親領養小孩
不知道你懂不懂得這之間的差異
不過事已至此，你若要堅持認為風向新聞那則是正確的，我也無可置喙
※ 編輯: Wengboyu (115.43.55.138), 05/26/2017 06:07:12
推
05/27 09:32, , 12F
05/27 09:32, 12F
推
07/12 13:39, , 13F
07/12 13:39, 13F
推
10/10 07:04, , 14F
10/10 07:04, 14F
討論串 (同標題文章)
ask-why 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
