Re: [新聞] 菜鳥醫師誤診 醫院判賠
雖然大家看到標題都很不舒服，但是法官判賠的原因卻是據此。
如果已經打到終審，醫院大概也只好賠了。但是，法官的認知確有討論空間。
爭議點：「醫學中心急診應該指派何種資歷之醫師診查檢傷第四第五級患者？」
答案恐怕是~!$%%!#%!% ←所以急專即將大熱門+急診R減薪？
所以，民事訴訟主要採取當事人進行，律師可能是因為企圖主張資淺而免責，又沒注意
到法官朝著醫院管理過失形成心證，才會賠這麼多！
所以，我想，是律師的錯..
clerk大有PO高院判決書：http://goo.gl/yZJq
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.137.211.99
→
06/16 14:05, , 1F
06/16 14:05, 1F
→
06/16 14:05, , 2F
06/16 14:05, 2F
→
06/16 14:05, , 3F
06/16 14:05, 3F
→
06/16 14:06, , 4F
06/16 14:06, 4F
→
06/16 14:07, , 5F
06/16 14:07, 5F
→
06/16 14:08, , 6F
06/16 14:08, 6F
→
06/16 14:09, , 7F
06/16 14:09, 7F
→
06/16 14:11, , 8F
06/16 14:11, 8F
→
06/16 14:11, , 9F
06/16 14:11, 9F
→
06/16 14:12, , 10F
06/16 14:12, 10F
→
06/16 14:12, , 11F
06/16 14:12, 11F
推
06/16 14:13, , 12F
06/16 14:13, 12F
※ 編輯: gentlwind 來自: 114.137.211.99 (06/16 14:15)
→
06/16 14:14, , 13F
06/16 14:14, 13F
→
06/16 14:15, , 14F
06/16 14:15, 14F
→
06/16 14:15, , 15F
06/16 14:15, 15F
→
06/16 14:16, , 16F
06/16 14:16, 16F
→
06/16 14:17, , 17F
06/16 14:17, 17F
→
06/16 14:19, , 18F
06/16 14:19, 18F
→
06/16 14:20, , 19F
06/16 14:20, 19F
→
06/16 14:20, , 20F
06/16 14:20, 20F
推
06/16 14:32, , 21F
06/16 14:32, 21F
→
06/16 14:32, , 22F
06/16 14:32, 22F
推
06/16 16:23, , 23F
06/16 16:23, 23F
→
06/16 16:27, , 24F
06/16 16:27, 24F
→
06/16 16:28, , 25F
06/16 16:28, 25F
→
06/16 17:08, , 26F
06/16 17:08, 26F
→
06/16 18:52, , 27F
06/16 18:52, 27F
→
07/25 21:37, , 28F
07/25 21:37, 28F
討論串 (同標題文章)
medstudent 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
