Re: The origin of this affair
看板Biotech (生命科學)作者mitbbsuser (mitbbs user)時間19年前 (2006/12/17 04:41)推噓2(2推 0噓 0→)留言2則, 2人參與討論串4/5 (看更多)
※ 引述《harry901 (33798)》之銘言：
: : My humble suggestions are
: : a. Don't make your judgement before you see those figures or do some analysis
: : yourself, don't trust Dr. Chang's lab only because it is a Taiwan lab.
: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
: It's well-known that we sholdn't make any comments.
: I don't know why a Taiwan lab is unbelievable.
: You may skip "Taiwan" but you didn't.
: Actually I'm confused how you added a comment "because it is a Taiwan lab".
I said "only because", not "because". Or should I have said "only merely
scantly because" to make my emphasis more clear to you?
Quote a ID named "nation" just said:
I chose to believe Dr. Chang's lab because I am Taiwanese
: : We are scientists, we should make judgement based on data, not subjective
: : allegation.
: : b. Don't blame those researchers from mainland on pointing out some
: : questionable figures. It just happened to be that those guy who wrote to Cell
: : are Chinese. They are not against you Taiwan fellows, they tried contacting
: : Dr. Chang at the very beginning, they desperately tried many different
: : methods to analyse the figure only because they didn't want to make any
: : harsh or even wrong observations before they wrote to the journal.
: : In a word, judge with your own eyes.
: : Thanks for reading
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 69.227.164.126
推
12/17 04:49, , 1F
12/17 04:49, 1F
推
12/17 04:52, , 2F
12/17 04:52, 2F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 5 篇)：
Biotech 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章