Re: [閒聊] 諾貝爾從未設經濟學獎！(商業周刊第 98 …

看板Economics (經濟學)作者magichsin (magichsin)時間17年前 (2006/10/30 06:47)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)

留言0則, 0人參與討論串6/7 (看更多)

這是http://nobelprize.org/index.html網頁裡的資料介紹了諾貝爾的各式獎項當然他也在裡面介紹了經濟學獎也很坦白的對這個獎項做了介紹所以不多贅述請大家看看吧~~ Introduction In conjunction with its tercentenary celebrations in 1968, Sveriges Riksbank (Bank of Sweden) instituted a new award, "The Central Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel", on the basis of an economic commitment by the bank in perpetuity. The award is given by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences according to the same principles as for the Nobel Prizes that have been awarded since 1901. The procedures for selecting the Laureates are also the same. Each year the Academy receives some 200-300 nominations, usually covering a little more than one hundred nominees. (Unsolicited suggestions from persons who have not been asked to submit nominations are not considered.) The Economics Prize Selection Committee of the Academy (with five to eight members) commissions expert studies of the most prominent candidates, sometimes by Swedish experts but usually by experts from other countries who are reputed internationally. The Prize Committee presents its award proposal to the Social Science Class (Class IX) of the Academy in the form of a report, with an extensive survey of the main candidates who are considered for a Prize. The report presents arguments in support of the proposal and includes all the solicited expert studies. On the basis of this material the class suggests a Laureate (or a shared prize between two or, at most, three Laureates) regularly following the Committee's proposal. Finally the entire Academy meets to take the final award decision, usually in October. What criteria have guided the awards so far? And what have been the main problems when selecting the Laureates? It is useful to start a discussion of these issues with a rough classification of the various types of Economics Prize awards given so far. It should be kept in mind, however, that all such classifications are rather arbitrary since the multidimensional nature of scientific contributions makes it difficult to avoid overlaps. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.229.16.232