Re: [文法] have been to & have gone to已刪文

看板Eng-Class (英文板)作者ostracize (bucolic)時間4年前 (2021/07/08 05:41)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)

留言0則, 0人參與討論串2/3 (看更多)

1. I have been to Taipei. (我到過台北。) 2. I have gone to Taipei. 英國人認為第2句話是(我已經去台北，人還沒回來。)。我既然人還在台北沒回來，怎麼與你對話呢?所以語意是錯誤的。在台灣，大部分的英語老師都是這樣教學生。 ------------------------------------------------------- 可是根據北美(美國和加拿大)的英語，第2句話有兩種可能的語意。(我已經去台北，人還沒回來。/我去過台北。)所以他們會覺得第1句英語和第2句英語都正確。 https://youtu.be/IelOAtachHM?t=461

網紅哥倫布是在加拿大受教育，所以他說: 我有去過加拿大。 O → I have gone to Canada. O → I have been to Canada. https://tendercarelife.pixnet.net/blog/post/216319968-%E6%97%A5%E5%B8%B8%E5%8F%A3%E8%AA%AA%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E5%B8%B8%E7%8A%AF%E9%8C%AF%E7%9A%8422%E5%80%8B%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E5%8F%A5%E5%AD%90%E5%BD%99%E6%95%B4 我在網路上也詢問過美國人，他們都說第二句話的文法是正確的。我列兩個網址給大家參考。我的問題: 1. Have you ever been to Singapore? 2. Have you ever gone to Singapore? 3. I have been to Singapore many times. 4. I have gone to Singapore many times. #1 and #3 are correct. Are #2 and #4 also acceptable in American English? 美國人回答: All are correct and acceptable in American English. https://www.englishforums.com/English/AmericanEnglishGoneTo/glhhl/post.htm 我的問題: I have gone to New York's Times Square many times. The above sentence is not acceptable in British English. Is it acceptable in American English? 美國人回答: It's fine in American English. https://www.usingenglish.com/forum/threads/288618-American-English-I-have-gone-to 1. I have been to Taipei before. (我以前到過台北) 2. I have gone to Taipei before. (我以前去過台北) 3. I have come to Taipei before. (我以前來過台北) 對於美國人和加拿大人，如果你人不在台北，你可以使用第1句和第2句；如果你人在台北，你可以使用第1句和第3句。對於英國人來說，不管你人在不在台北，你都只能使用第1句。 -- Practice doesn't necessarily make perfect, but it makes permanent. Premature practice (practice beyond the learner's competence) or practice without error correction makes imperfection permanent. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.240.134.126 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1625694100.A.866.html