Re: [Talk] decision theory

看板EngTalk (全英文聊天)作者celestial09 (celestial)時間16年前 (2009/10/26 14:02)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)

留言0則, 0人參與討論串3/9 (看更多)

※ 引述《serveto (〈ψ︱A︱ψ〉)》之銘言： : rational choice theory : http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/economics/#5 : individual rationality: : the barebones theory of rationality takes the agent's preferences : (rankings of objects of choice) to be rational if they are complete and : transitive : collective rationality and social choice : although societies are very different from individuals, they evaluate : alternatives and make choices, which may be rational or irrational. : game theory : when outcomes depend on what several agents do, one agent's best choice : may depend on what other agents choose. although the principles of : rationality governing individual choice still apply, arguably there are : further principles of rationality governing expectations of the actions : of others http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationality the German sociologist Max Weber proposed an interpretation of social action that distinguished between four different types of rationality. the first, which he called Zweckrational or purposive/instrumental rationality, is related to the expectations about the behavior of other human beings or objects in the environment. these expectations serve as means for a particular actor to attain ends, ends which Weber noted were "rationally pursued and calculated." the second type, Weber called Wertrational or value/belief- oriented. Here the action is undertaken ....... ----------------------------------------------------------- Man, I think this is an extremely smart analysis. I bet you are a smart scholar. This post can be applied to the mind-sharing/value exchange post, "No Cultrue". and analyze it in a mataphysical and rational way. With this post, all things are clear. The origin is there....merely a conflic of rationally pursued OR value/belief oriented value system. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 76.204.36.189