[英中] 60-Second Science2

看板Translation (筆譯/翻譯)作者luxuryvogue (luxuryvogue)時間14年前 (2011/01/30 18:08)推噓0(0推 0噓 1→)

留言1則, 1人參與討論串1/1

http://tinyurl.com/25hafe8 先感謝版上高手^^ 上一篇經過解釋後才發現自己誤會意思了所以又找了一篇原文第三段，有問題主要是最後一句。附上全部的翻譯 To examine what we really think about creativity, scientists asked students to present ideas for how airlines can get more revenue from their passengers. [為了暸解我們到底怎樣看待創造這件事，科學家請學生針對航空公司要如何從乘客中獲取更多利益提出相關解法] (針對航空公司要如何獲取更多利益) (這句只寫這樣好像也不會影響意思?) Half the students were told to come up with novel solutions, and the rest were asked to stick with something more tried-and-true. [科學家要求一半的學生提出有新意的方法，剩下的學生則是要他們找出已經被證實有用的方法] Other students who then listened to these pitches rated those who were innovative as having less leadership potential. (老實說我搞不懂這句 ) 是A組的人說B組的人沒有領導潛力? 還是另外有一組C組人來評A組跟B組然後推論B組的人沒有領導潛力硬翻的結果就變成 [結論是那些提出創新解法的人，被認定比較沒有領導潛力] -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.160.145.77